Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

According to MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace, JD Vance fact-checking lying moderators is “mansplaining” but if the two women are that pathetic they cannot listen to a man explain, they have no business pretending to moderate the Vice Presidential debate on national TV.

“If you’re a woman that might be the worst moment JD Vance had. He was going to mansplain right over that mute button.”

If that is the “worst moment” Vance had then it’s unfathomable what his “best moment” would be. And unclear when Wallace became the spokesperson for all women but can we please get someone who is not so pathetic and fragile as her?

According to Fox News:

Despite CBS announcing that it would not allow live fact-checking during the debate, moderator Margaret Brennan, interjected to correct Vance after he suggested that illegal immigrants are overwhelming resources in Springfield, Ohio.

"Just to clarify for our viewers, Springfield, Ohio does have a large number of Haitian migrants who have legal status, temporary protected status," Brennan said.

The moderators are the ones who cannot follow their rules, not Vance.

When Vance tried to push back on the fact-check, Brennan and her co-moderator Norah O'Donnell attempted to speak over Vance, insisting that they had to move on to the next question.

"The rules were that you guys weren't going to fact-check," Vance reminded them. "And since you are fact-checking me, I think it's important to say what's actually going on."

While explaining the process of obtaining legal status and tying it to a Harris-backed immigration policy, the moderators again spoke over Vance, thanking him for "describing the legal process" before they cut off his microphone as Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz attempted to argue with him.

The fact that this was about Springfield is even more telling, as the media’s reporting on that has been deranged and fictitious. The difference between Vance and the moderators is that he respects the American people enough to keep them informed while the media could care less about truth as they mock voters into oblivion.

The only misogynistic statement made that night was by Wallace. She appears to believe women are so vulnerable that men cannot correct the record when they are blatantly lying to the American people.

Question: Do voters not deserve to know the truth at the expense of 10 seconds of “mansplaining”?

According to the Interweb, the definition of this made-up word is, “the explanation of something by a man, typically to a woman, in a manner regarded as condescending or patronizing.”

Did he explain something as a “man?” Yes. Did he do that to a “woman”? Yes, whatever that even means. And did he do it in a “condescending or patronizing” way? No, but MSNBC did.

By their standards, this must mean he “mansplained” to Tim Walz.

The real problem here is that “reporters” are intentionally misleading the American people and it’s disgusting. These are individuals with a clear agenda and the left thinks they can cry victim the moment their reality starts crumbling.

What the left is really upset about is that Vance is a man who was not afraid to explain THE TRUTH to voters, which is something the media has no interest in. The point of the debate was not to inform people, it was to mislead, as evidenced by the moderator's actions and cries about unreal things.

If Wallace has nothing substantial to say about men besides how much she despises them then the least she can do is keep her mouth shut. However, we live in a time where people like her are paid to do just that. But the American people are sick of it and whatever it is the left is trying to do won’t work.

All Vance did was call out a liar for trying to deceive hundreds of millions of Americans; there is nothing inherently wrong with that. And for the left to try and pretend they were virtuous in that regard is disingenuous and a mockery to voters.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com