Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

It’s either that Ilhan Omar is completely dishonest, or she has never seen a single video of Charlie Kirk speaking. While both could technically be true, I’m starting to believe it’s the former.

The left has every right to disagree with him politically, but it is factually incorrect to claim his legacy was even remotely filled with “bigotry, hatred, and white supremacy.”

Is this what Omar considers “knowing” Charlie Kirk?’

I am having trouble seeing how that is what she calls "bigoted.

There was nothing hateful about that, and it's likely Omar knows it.

Omar also claims she refuses to “rewrite history” regarding Charlie Kirk, but after reviewing every available clip of him online, I haven’t found anything remotely racist or bigoted. This is why her comments are not only disingenuous but false.

Why does it feel like she’s desperately trying to make this about herself? Why does it seem like she’s emphasizing her own victimhood, as shown by her bringing up skin color? If she is, Charlie has some words for her.

Most people reading this already know who the real racists and bigots are, and it certainly wasn’t the man who engaged in civil debate up until the moment he died. It’s clear that Omar projects her insecurities onto him, as she desperately fails to have even a fraction of the legacy Charlie built. She knows this, and that is precisely why she criticizes him. In her attempt to “rewrite history,” she has revealed just how biased and intolerant she truly is—and she’s fooling no one.

- YouTube www.youtube.com