Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

According to CNN’s Data Analyst Harry Enten, you should not be surprised that people who have served in the military largely approve of the U.S. strikes on Iran when compared to voters overall.

He cites a Fox News Poll:

Among Republicans, more than 8 in 10 approve of the current U.S. use of force, while only 6 in 10 say the president’s actions on Iran are making the U.S. safer.

Nearly 8 in 10 Democrats disapprove of the U.S. strikes and think things are less safe because of Trump’s performance, while 6 in 10 or more independents think the same on both counts.

Among voters who have served in the military, 59% approve of the U.S. strikes on Iran (39% disapprove). Compared to voters overall, who say the U.S. is less safe by a wide margin, veterans are more closely divided on the question of whether Trump’s actions have made the country safer (37%) or less safe (44%).

The net approval rating overall for Trump's foreign policy positions is up by eight points.

“Those who served in the military, they like what is going on, on average,” Enten said, adding that, “there is nearly a 30-point gap between those who served in the military and overall.” This is important because it means those with actual military experience — those who personally understand foreign conflict — back Trump’s approach in Iran by a significant margin.

This may prove that Trump’s "Peace Through Strength" approach is the best approach. While the general public is split on this issue, and you are free to draw your own conclusions, it is undeniable that this hits home for those who have served in the military.

Isn't it ironic that the loudest people opposing this approach have likely never come close to serving in the armed forces, while those who have lived it strongly approve? That tells you all you need to know, doesn't it?

- YouTube www.youtube.com