VOTE IN THE LWC 2024 GOP STRAW POLL! CLICK HERE!

Parents who want to know about their children’s gender identity are a “clear and present danger,” according to one progressive judge in California.

San Bernardino County Superior Court Judge Thomas Garza issued a temporary restraining order on what Attorney General Rob Bonta calls a "forced outing policy" after he filed a lawsuit last week regarding Chino Valley Unified School District’s parental notification policy.

The District approved a policy in July that requires schools to inform parents whenever a student requests to use a name or pronoun different from that on their birth certificate. The policy also requires notification if a student requests to use facilities or participates in programs that don't align with their sex.

“Today’s decision by the San Bernardino Superior Court rightfully upholds the state rights of our LGBTQ+ students and protects kids from harm by immediately halting the board’s forced outing policy,” Bonta said.

In case it wasn’t obvious, Bonta’s statement is totally something a communist freak tyrant would say. ‘The state rights of OUR LGBTQ+ kids.’ Or in other words, ‘The state is stealing the right to parent your own child and now it's up to them to decide what goes.’ And you need to shut up and take it.

Democrats don’t even hide that they want to destroy the nuclear family. Parents who even think they have a right to know what is going on at their kid’s school are “dangerous.”

Basically, the government abolishes the rights of parents, gaslights kids into thinking their own parents are dangerous, and subsequently turns the state into mommy and daddy. But don’t worry, that has worked out every time this has happened in history. Nothing to see about here. Not that you even have the right to know.

During the hearing, Garza compared changing gender to changing religion and said he found "no stated, clear purpose" for a parental notification policy.

"Let’s say that a student was raised under one religion, then decides to change that religion on their own, at whatever age," Garza said. "With that in mind, whatever the class of protected students are, students are students. Whatever makeup that they comprise, it strikes me that you are singling out a group that is exposed to a clear and present danger."

The judge reportedly admitted he hadn’t actually looked at the argument in favor of informing parents. But that wasn’t his concern, he suggested.

That is definitely what a fair and unbiased judge would do. There’s no way he has a political agenda.

The hearing on the attorney general's motion for a preliminary injunction is scheduled for Oct. 13.