×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
ButΒ FacebookΒ is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
Politics
January 15, 2026
Alleged "doctor" can't tell GOP senator whether or not men can get pregnant, despite repeated opportunities to answer
Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!
Sen. Josh @HawleyMO: "Can men get pregnant?"
Dr. Nisha Verma: "I'm not really sure what the goal of the question is."
Hawley: "The goal is just to establish a biological reality...Can men get pregnant?" pic.twitter.com/4egtfZrPgB
β CSPAN (@cspan) January 14, 2026
Right before Senator Josh Hawley questioned Dr Nisha Verma, she claimed science should be evidence-based and not political. However, she instantly ate her own words when she refused to answer whether or not men can get pregnant.
According to NDTV:
Testifying before the Senate Health, Education, Labour and Pensions Committee, Dr Verma said abortion medication has been widely studied and safely used for decades, warning that restrictions driven by politics are causing harm.
"Medication abortion has been rigorously studied and proven safe and effective in over 100 high-quality peer-reviewed studies," she told lawmakers, noting that more than 7.5 million people in the United States have used the drugs since their approval in 2000.
You want to know who the drug is not βsafeβ for: itβs the baby. You cannot label a drug as safe when the goal of that drug is to unalive one of the people involved. Thatβs not medicine, and itβs disgusting how she portrays the other side as the ones making this political when she is pretending the drug is not intended to kill.
Hawley pressed Dr Verma, a senior adviser to Physicians for Reproductive Health, with the question, "Can men get pregnant?"
Verma, appearing as a Democratic witness, hesitated, saying she cared for patients with a variety of gender identities. "I do take care of people that don't identify as women," she said, avoiding a simple yes or no.
Okay? People can make up any identity they want in their imagination, but that does not negate biological reality. Any woman can claim to be a man, but that does not change the fact that every cell in her body is female. As she said, politics do not belong in medicine. So, maybe a political scientist might condone and affirm these fake identities, but medical doctors should not.
She said, "Science and evidence should guide medicine. But I also think yes or no questions like this are political tools." When Hawley interrupted, arguing that the question is about truth and biological reality, Verma responded, "I'm trying to reduce the complexity of the question."
LOL. Itβs actually not that complicated. In fact, itβs so easy that even toddlers can answer this question. But someone who spent years in medical school and years in residency cannot seem to comprehend this. Why do you think that is? Could it be because she prioritizes political ideology or science? I think we all know the answer to that.
Itβs comical that βexpertsβ will go and answer questions for the entire country and cannot even answer the most basic question that even a two-year-old could answer. You truly cannot make this level of insanity up.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Latest




