Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

The UK has decided to spend resources on policing kids aged 13-17 on whether they are posting politically incorrect material online. Throughout this campaign, they hope to instill fear in the younger generation that what you retweet or like might get you convicted under the Terrorism Act.

According to Action Counters Terrorism:

Terrorist-related offending can include:
displaying the signs, symbols and slogans of terrorist groups
creating extremist content that celebrates terrorists or terrorist groups
sharing extremist content that celebrates terrorists or terrorist groups
encouraging other people to commit terrorist crimes
threatening acts of violence for terrorist causes online.

So, while you don’t actually have to have anything to do with terrorism to be convicted of “Terrorist-related offending,” a simple retweet might land you with a conviction.

For the record, terrorism is very, very bad. You already knew that. The problem is not that the government wants to put an end to terrorism; it is that they are throwing out ambiguous definitions while holding the power to prosecute selectively. It is the government that decides what a terrorist-related offense is, which means they have the power to label anyone and everyone a terrorist.

What is even worse, however, is that the UK has a lot of problems, and it is doubtful that youth terrorism is one.

According to Parliament, “In the year ending March 2025, there were around 53,000 offences involving a sharp instrument in England and Wales.”

Maybe they could do a thing or two about their stabbing epidemic, but clearly, they have far bigger thought crimes to fry.

The goal is simple here: Scare the younger generation into not promoting content the government does not like, to take control of the people. To call that tyrannical would be an understatement.

In March 2024, “A far-right activist who set up an online library of racist stickers for supporters to download and put up in their area was jailed. Samuel Melia, 34, a regional organiser for right-wing organisation Patriotic Alternative, distributed the printable stickers via an online channel with the intent of stirring up racial hatred.”

Nick Price, head of the CPS Special Crime and Counter Terrorism Division, said:

“He was very deliberate in the manner he wanted to spread his messages of racial hatred, and online messages recovered made it clear that he knew these stickers were being displayed in public and causing damage to public property.

“It is illegal to publish such material intending to stir up racial hatred towards others, and the CPS will not hesitate to bring prosecutions against those who break the law in this way.”

The stickers that authorities claimed were intended to stir up racial hatred included some of the following slogans:

“Intolerance is a virtue”, “they seek conquest not asylum” and “there is a war on whites”.

I certainly would not classify this as stirring up racial hatred, but even if it did, it is hard to see how that is a crime. What does it even mean to stir up hatred? And what about when hatred is stirred up against White people? Isn't it by definition, prosecuting someone who claims “there is a war on whites”, stirring up racial hatred against White people? That remains unclear, but you can draw your own conclusions.

That being said, the UK government is pathetic, to say the very least. And their little campaign to “instill” fear in the younger generation is exactly what every dystopian novel warns us.

- YouTube www.youtube.com