×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
Articles
February 02, 2026
UK thinks we need to do something about walking dogs in public parks, because it upsets Muslims
Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!
BREAKING: UK Government launches a new drive to turn the countryside "less white"
"One problem for MusIims is dogs" pic.twitter.com/2eNnh7iokk
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) February 2, 2026
While you may have already known that the government in the UK gives special treatment to one ethnicity over the other, what you may have never expected is that, to appease the altar of diversity, your dogs are no longer safe.
According to the Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature, Islam sees “dogs as impure animals, or, at least, that their saliva is a contaminant that voids a Muslim’s ritual purity.” But it's not just that they don't like dogs; they are also racist towards dogs. According to “Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, black dogs are evil, or even devils, in animal form.”
So, not only are your dogs not safe anymore in the UK, but they may or may not go after the Black dogs first. Incredible, yet deeply racist towards our canine population.
According to the European Conservative:
The Labour government has drawn up plans to make Britain’s countryside “less white,” after government-commissioned reports claimed rural England could become “irrelevant” in an increasingly multicultural society.
Internal documents describe rural England as a “white environment” dominated by the “white middle class”, and argue that urgent action is needed to attract more ethnic minority visitors.
This is where the attacks on the dogs come in.
Other recommendations focus on everyday rural life. One suggests dogs should be kept under stricter control, citing fears of these animals among some communities. Another claims that while “white English” visitors value solitude and quiet contemplation, ethnic minority visitors tend to prefer social or group activities.
Why must the majority of the population appease the fraction? What is the benefit of that? And why, in a non-Islamist country, must rules be made over dog ownership? None of this is logical. But what is even more foolish is that if Muslims hate living in the UK so much, so much so that they wish to change everything about Western civilization, why don't they just stay in the places they ran away from? If they truly prefer those laws, why leave? Again, these questions have yet to be answered, but you can draw your own conclusions.
That being said, under leftist rule, and what appears to eventually become Islamist rule, the dogs are not safe. And after they go after the dogs, we can only assume as to who will be next.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Latest
Don't Miss




