It should not be legal for Frankenstein doctors to butcher minors all under the guise of trans insanity, which is exactly why SCOTUS upheld a Tennessee ban on sex changes for minors.

According to The Post Millennial:

The Supreme Court has upheld Tennessee's law that prohibits child sex changes. The ruling was 6-3.

I think it’s pretty clear who voted in favor and who voted against the ruling.

The court noted that Tennessee’s SB1 includes two classifications, one based on age and another based on medical use. "The plaintiffs argue that SB1 warrants heightened scrutiny because it relies on sex-based classifications. But neither of the above classifications turns on sex. Rather, SB1 prohibits healthcare providers from administering puberty blockers or hormones to minors for certain medical uses, regardless of a minor’s sex."

The ruling later added, "The application of SB1, moreover, does not turn on sex. The law does not prohibit certain medical treatments for minors of one sex while allowing those same treatments for minors of the opposite sex."

That is because the entire premise behind the intervention is to deny one's sex, despite biological reality. Thus, you cannot discriminate based on sex when the medical intervention intends to destroy it.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the court’s opinion, "This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field. The voices in these debates raise sincere concerns; the implications for all are profound. The Equal Protection Clause does not resolve these disagreements. Nor does it afford us license to decide them as we see best. Our role is not “to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic” of the law before us, Beach Communications, 508 U. S., at 313, but only to ensure that it does not violate the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment. Having concluded it does not, we leave questions regarding its policy to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process."

Although I would tend to agree with the majority of that statement, I don’t believe there should be a “democratic process” on whether or not these interventions are allowed for children.

Not only is it based on a lie that one can change their sex, despite the left claiming the premise mandates that gender and sex are two different things, but it medically destroys these children before they even have a chance to reach full maturity. And the fact that the left believes this is the compassionate approach is deranged and should not even be up for discussion.

That said, many leftists fought against this, which is a scandal in itself, but fortunately, sanity has prevailed, at least for now.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com