
×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
TyrannyJune 07, 2025
Blue state landlord illustrates how Dems give delinquent freeloaders more rights: "We just start the process all over again..."
While the left claims to fight for the little guy, their policies couldn’t be further from that reality. And don’t even think about becoming a small landlord—because thanks to them, only massive, multi-million-dollar corporations can survive.
Oh, and the best part? If you think you have something called “private property rights,” think again. The state can basically use de facto eminent domain to let someone live on your property—someone who doesn’t own it—while you foot the bill.
They call this “tenant rights,” but in reality, it is state-sanctioned stealing.
One Oregon landlord has made the rounds on social media after discussing her struggles with evicting a nightmare tenant, as it’s been nearly impossible for her.
Landlord says Oregon Democrats have made it impossible to evict tenants
She says the tenants don’t pay rent and they can even change the locks on the doors so owners can’t get in
“Do you guys know that in Oregon it's virtually impossible to evict a tenant in your property if… pic.twitter.com/gAwLtVFIpd
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) June 5, 2025
These kinds of loopholes are common in progressive-run areas, where scam artists posing as tenants know exactly how to drag disputes through the court system indefinitely.
Since when was it a thing for the government to take your property and give it to someone else without compensation?
This is what the left means when they claim housing should be a human right, as you can’t do that without taking housing away from rightful owners.
Is there any evidence that these sorts of rules have made housing more affordable for the average American? No? Didn’t think so.
Why does it seem as if there is a deliberate push to keep small, family-run businesses from thriving? These laws give the appearance that they are created to protect the poor, but the ultra-wealthy can easily work around them thanks to their resources, making these rules just another part of business for big corporations.
If the left’s goal was to destroy the mom-and-pop landlord, well, congrats — because that’s exactly what they’re doing. And despite their claims of wanting to make housing affordable again, they’re the sole reason we’re in this mess. And calling this predictable would be an understatement.
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
Latest