Jasmine Crockett has decided to question the ethics behind deportation by proving to be nothing more than a naive buffoon.

Crockett claimed that deporting criminal aliens back to their home country is de facto “kidnapping” and that the United States should think about how we would feel if other nations started sending back Americans who have broken their immigration laws.

You really cannot get a lower IQ than that. Was that really the best she could do? I guess we should not expect more from the woman who claims illegal immigration is not a crime.

LOL. The fact-checker really fact-checked her on that.

What this proves is that she has no clue what she's defending, yet will do so to appease the left, despite being morally and factually incorrect.

She would have a point if she were talking about US citizens, but she is talking about foreign nationals. They have no right to freely remain here, especially when they have committed crimes post facto, and it's astonishing how much time and effort she dedicates to people who should not even be here in the first place.

And let’s finally address the elephant in the room: the lack of basic competence.

Because this really highlights the deeper issue: The United States must consider implementing IQ assessments for those who wish to run for public office. Because at this point, the lunatics are running the asylum, and now we have people committed to representing anyone but the ones they took an oath for.

Maybe, just maybe, Crockett will fight for you the way she does for criminal aliens, but until then, don't hold your breath.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com