Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Just when you thought the State of California could not possibly find another way to waste taxpayer funds, lawmakers beat everyone's expectations.

A proposed California law “would expand access to state-funded legal representation for undocumented immigrants,” according to Newsweek.

Last time I checked, it was not the job of elected officials to fund the legal bills of foreign nationals, especially on the taxpayers' dime. While I am no legal expert, I am having a hard time seeing how this is legal, but draw your own conclusions.

It is almost like lawmakers took a look at all the fraud and misuse of funds and decided to DOUBLE IT. From over $100 million in hospice fraud to spending $24 billion on homeless initiatives — which made the problem worse — to the $126 billion train to nowhere — to its $114 million butterfly bridge — the state just cannot help itself.

Assembly Bill 2600, proposed by Assemblymember Mia Bonta (D-Oakland), would expand access to publicly funded attorneys for individuals facing immigration proceedings in California.

Let us get this straight. Some foreign nationals broke federal immigration laws. Subsequently, they should be deported. Rather than do that, the state believes taxpayers should pay for their pathetic fight to stay, while getting nothing in return. Call me crazy, but for an agreement to be mutually beneficial, don't both sides have to benefit? The math is not adding up.

The proposal is part of a push in California among progressive lawmakers to expand access to legal counsel for people facing deportation. It comes as state lawmakers weigh how far public funding should go in supporting undocumented immigrants, a question that has drawn criticism from opponents who argue taxpayer dollars should not be used for legal aid in immigration cases and who question state spending priorities, amid stepped-up federal immigration enforcement under the Trump administration that has led to thousands of migrants without legal status being detained in California.

Again, it is unclear if this law would be what you would call “legal,” but that is not up for me to decide. Nonetheless, the state really has a way of proving who it truly intends to represent, and it certainly is not you — the American people. And to call that a slap in the face to the great people of this nation would be an understatement.

- YouTube www.youtube.com