Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Last week, the Democrats’ rising star made headlines because she thought she knew a thing or two about “a Jeffrey Epstein.” Turns out she knows nothing, and in the pursuit of owning it to conservatives, she slandered an innocent neurosurgeon. Rather than apologize for her sloppy mistake, she refuses to even pretend to care, making it clear she gets a pass for reasons that will never make sense.

According to the New York Post:

Crockett boasted on the House floor this week that she was “gonna expose it all” after her discovery that “somebody named Jeffrey Epstein” donated to the campaign of former Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY).

In her rant, the Texas Democrat strongly implied that the Manhasset doctor’s April and August 2020 contributions to Zeldin, who is now head of the Environmental Protection Agency, were actually from the convicted pedophile — despite the fact that the $1,000 donations were made months after the disgraced financier died in a Manhattan jail cell.

According to Crockett, “Epstein” is not a very common name. But according to the United States Census, “Epstein is the 2786th most common surname in the United States, belonging to 12952 individuals.” Additionally, over 1 million people are named Jeffrey. Given that this makes it very possible there are at least several people with the name “Jeffrey Epstein,” you would think she would do her due diligence before attempting to convince Americans a congressman took money from a convicted pedophile. But she did not, because according to her, “she absolutely insinuated it could be possible.” But she added she was speaking with “specificity,” which is what comes with being an attorney and why she does not have to admit or apologize for her ill intentions.

Makes sense, doesn’t it?

She also claimed the donations came in before Epstein allegedly unalived himself, but that’s also a disingenuous lie. But again, she has “no amendments.” She said what she said, and she’s running with it. Why she does not just admit what she did and apologize is beyond reason, but clearly, in her mind, the left can do no wrong when it comes to slandering Republicans. But what else is new?

- YouTube www.youtube.com