Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Check out our Election 2026 Dashboard to keep track ot the upcoming midterms!

Good news, fellas! The streets are saying there is outrage over Sydney Sweeney again, which gives us here at the Louder with Crowder website a reason to share her new ad where she gets mostly nekkid. It's for a sports betting app, marketed towards dudebros since they're the ones who like hitting their parlays and thinking about getting over/under Sweeney. Yet, for unclear reasons, women are upset at Sydney setting back "women in sport." Apropos of nothing, let's see a Venn diagram of people who can't calm down about this ad and people who think Lindsay Clancy was a good mother.

Is there ackschual outrage? No. At best, there is the media claiming there is outrage because a handful out of the 900 million women on TikTok had a silly opinion. Whose videos then get shared by right-wing ragebait-grifting Twitter. It's a vicious cycle.

What this is really about is that Sydney Sweeney is considered MAGA-adjacent, didn't apologize when too many Trump supporters vocally appreciated her contributions to society, so now the media needs to destroy her any chance they get for clicks.

As with a lot of our most recent "culture wars," it pops off in Variety writing a "news" article about "backlash." They cite two female athletes claiming Sydney is sexualizing women in sport. This ignores the fact she isn't sexualizing anything that has to do with women in sport. She is sexualizing guys betting on sport. Football just started up again. None of those guys care what a women in sport is.

Also, neither of these athletes quoted are American. So who gives a rip what they think?

Sydney Sweeney addressed the outrage on Instagram, pointing out ALL THE ATHLETES who also took their clothes off. There weren't any Variety articles about any backlash towards them. Go figure, right?

But this has nothing to do with backlash to Sydney Sweeney getting nekkid to promote gambling, and everything to do with her being considered "MAGA" and therefore anything she does ever for any reason is bad.

How does one be considered "MAGA," you ask? If you, a celebrity, or even a normie who happens to go viral on the internets, at any point in your life, expressed an opinion, or shared a post, or liked a meme that the left disapproves of... congratulations, you are MAGA, no questions asked. We meet on the second Thursday of every month. There is punch and pie.

It started back when she threw her mom a birthday party, and some of the guests wore "Make Sixty Great Again" hats. A year later, reporters were still expecting her to apologize.

You had 2025, when she did an American Eagle ad. Too many of us on the right were having fun on the internet about Trump getting elected, and suddenly hot chicks were back in advertising. The left hates it when we have fun, and demanded Sweeney apologize for her whiteness and for too many of the wrong people expressing gratitude over how she fills out a pair of jeans.

Then when she launched a lingerie line in 2026, the left worked politics into that. Same reason. Too many guys who voted for Trump also enjoy looking at Sydney Sweeney in her underwear. Therefore, something about it is racist, sexist, and wrong.

An actress who has f*ck all to do with women in sport is being attacked for being so hot that it makes women in sport feel bad about themselves. And that actress might not hate Trump supporters. That's every Sydney Sweeney controversy.

><><><><><><

Brodigan is Grand Poobah of this here website and when he isn't writing words about things enjoys day drinking, pro-wrestling, and country music. You can find him on the Twitter too.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Sign up for our DAILY EMAIL BLASTS! They can't stop us from delivering our content straight to your inbox. Yet.