Female Student Has Sex With Drunk Male Student... But HE Gets Expelled!?
When it comes to college and rape, the left tends to get its way regardless of the facts (see Justice? College Withholds Degree of Student ACQUITTED of Rape and Obama and Biden Seek to Defund Colleges 'Guilty' of... 'Rape Culture?'). Such details have little bearing on feminist justice, you sexist fat-shaming pig. Take this situation for example. A few years ago, a female student at Drake University claimed she was raped by a male student. In the long investigation to follow, developments were brought to light. Spoiler: she's a liar-liar pants on fire.
Firstly, she refused a physical examination. Red flag numero uno. Secondly, she was the one pushing herself onto the male student, who was allegedly drunk and has a learning disability (ADHD). Bearing all that in mind, the school expelled him...
The student, "John Doe," was expelled for sexual misconduct - ostensibly because he engaged in non consensual sex with a female student, "Jane Doe."
Jane [said] she was intoxicated, although investigation suggests she exaggerated. She claimed she tripped on the sidewalk ... and fell, though a witness refuted this. She also claimed a bartender served her a drink. But the bartender said that never happened.
In the eventual hearing, Jane Doe admitted to initiating oral sex on John Doe without his consent.
Other than the lies, what else did you notice? This girl admitted to touching a dude without consent. While he was drunk. Sounds a lot like... rape.
It goes without saying, but we'll say it anyway for the leftists in the back: if the roles were reversed and the male student admitted to performing oral on the female student while she was passed out, case closed. Rapist. Forever ostracized from civil society.
But it gets worse...
[Later] John remembered passing out in his bed and Jane telling him she was leaving. Jane remembered waking up to discover John on top of her, wearing a condom. Her pants were pulled down. She claimed she told him to stop, he did, and she left. (Whether this actually happened is in serious dispute.)
But Jane did not go straight home. She went to another fraternity house, uninvited, and climbed into bed with an unsuspecting person. She "jumped on him," and he told her to leave, according to the lawsuit. She then headed to a different bedroom, removed her shirt, and initiated oral sex on a third person.
So the crazed strumpet continued her sex rampage, leaving other victims in her wake. Not big on consent, the alleged penis-loving harlot, what with the pleasuring she was performing on non-consenting men.
It sounds like this lady is a bit whorish. But the school didn't see it that way, thanks to Title IX.
Drake refused to act upon this new information, even when John's father - a trustee at Drake - explicitly requested an investigation into Jane's misconduct towards John. Such a request would constitute retaliation against Jane for coming forward in the first place, according to university officials, and was thus illegal under Title IX.
Evidence didn't matter here, narrative did. The narrative being, "Women are always the victims of rape," ergo in this case, since there was one man and one woman, the woman was automatically the victim, the man the automatic guilty pig. Since the investigation, the school forced John's father to resign. The male student was thrown to the feminist she-wolves... Despite the girl's "evidence" amounting to diddly squat. If you want to define "problematic" this is it. See also Students Accused of Rape Suspended, Lose Scholarships. Except the 'Victim?' Yeah, She Lied.
Welcome to the world of leftist equality...