We recently reported about a man randomly punching unsuspecting women in NYC. The man the NYPD believes is responsible for this has been arrested several times in the past six months. Common sense should tell anyone with a fraction of a brain that if this man was held accountable for his crimes, then he would have been in jail and none of this would have happened. But we all know common sense is not common among those on the Left.

When you have an entire movement based on anything but making sense, mixed in with the majority being painfully naive, combined with the fact that all that is fueled through disdain for anyone who dares disagree with them, you get this story.

The Salon has a reprehensible take on the brazen NYC attacks. Rather than hold the psycho responsible for these crimes accountable, they have decided to place blame on “male rage” that supposedly fuels the “MAGA” movement, as they claim this is “an extreme manifestation of men feeling entitled to women's time and attention.”

According to the Salon:

Whatever the scale of this problem eventually turns out to be, it's not surprising that these stories have gone viral and captured the public's imagination. While it rarely turns to violence, most women who spend much time walking around in public have experience with men who berate them for paying attention to something other than the man who is now, often out of nowhere, spewing invectives. In our modern era, that often manifests with men who are infuriated at women for looking at their phones. But I'm old enough to remember when I would get yelled at for reading books in public.

Okay. That makes no sense. There is absolutely no epidemic of men becoming enraged because women are not paying attention to them. I also highly doubt the writer has ever gotten “yelled at for reading books in public.” I would bet a lot of money that that never happened. Because no one, man or woman, has yelled at someone for reading in public. That is not a thing. At least to the extent that you would mention it in an article about brazen attacks in NYC.

Whatever the excuse the angry man concocts, the impetus is always the same: The eyes of a woman are directed at someone or something that is not him, and he is indignant over it. So he will make sure she has no choice but to look at him, either by getting in her face or — in these alarming New York cases — punching her. If he cannot capture her adoring gaze, well, he will make her stare at him in fear.

These stories resonate, as well, because the nation is having a moment of increasingly unhinged male fury at women for daring to have lives that are centered around something other than catering to a man's every whim. Unleashed by Donald Trump and the MAGA movement, there's an upswell of loud male entitlement shouting at us from every corner.

This article is extremely infuriating because if it were actually up to the “MAGA movement,” this man would be in jail. But this happened in NYC. Where progressive policies are the priority and city officials don’t believe in accountability. Which is why the guy was out in the first place. And we all know that felons love to vote for Democrats. So much so that there is no possible way that the man who punched these women would ever vote for Trump or any policy related to the “MAGA movement.”

We see it in the male fans of Jordan Peterson, who clamor to his events to hear him croak out a just-so story about how lobsters justify their faith in male dominance. Or the rise of "tradwives" online who make a living pretending they're unemployed and housebound. Or Ben Shapiro setting fire to a Barbie doll because he can't stand that a blockbuster comedy starring a woman is about anything but her quest for male affection. Or MAGA pundits telling lies about birth control, in hopes of tricking women into having babies before they're ready. Or conservatives writing op-eds that blame women for male loneliness, telling women they must self-sacrifice to relieve male pain by marrying Donald Trump voters. Or right-wing men yelling because Taylor Swift has cats or because she dates a hunky, vaccinated NFL player instead of, I dunno, having babies with a guy in ill-fitting cargo shorts.

Wow. Now it's Jordan Peterson’s fault and “MAGA pundits telling lies about birth control.” And then in the same breath, she claims this has something to do with “right-wing men yelling because Taylor Swift has cats.” The mental gymnastics is exhausting, yet not surprising. But the most asinine thing is not her lack of logic nor her pathetic unhinged rant, it's that people actually believe this crap.

I wish I could tell you this article was satire, but it's not. It is the real deal. But the most infuriating thing is that this situation has nothing to do with Conservatives or right-wing men, and has everything to do with Progressives and the lawlessness they promote through their asinine ideology in their purist of utopia.

Progressives are the masters of psychological projections, which is why they always point the finger at everyone else for the ruin they create and condone.

Another great example of this is when the DNC claimed it was MAGA Republicans who wanted to defund the police.

The left's ideology is so abhorrent and fuels so much misery, that it would be political suicide for them to admit they are the creators of this chaos.

It is because progressives hate bail and see criminals as victims that keep violent offenders out of jail. And it is because their entire movement condones lawlessness that we increasingly are seeing brazen attacks on innocent victims. But for goodness sake, how on earth is the writer going to try and blame the “MAGA movement” when this happened in NYC? To say that is a stretch would be an understatement.

Non-Contributing Zeroes Will Vote for their own Free Sh*t while Everyone Else Pays for it.www.youtube.com