
×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
ArticlesApril 30, 2025
Democrat senator DEFENDS putting men in women's prisons, thinks you're the "ridiculous" one for thinking otherwise
A woman was assaulted by a male inmate in a California prison after a self-identified trans individual claimed to feel some type of way. During court, the judge ordered the victim to refer to her alleged attacker with “she/her” pronouns, despite everyone knowing the truth.
That is the reality many female inmates deal with, and it’s all in the name of progress. However, California Democrats cannot be bothered to even pretend to care, as they are beholden to being inclusive at the expense of being morally correct.
SB 337 was introduced by Senator Menjivar and is intended to “enact legislation to address sexual assault against incarcerated persons in prison.” During the committee hearing, State Senator Scott Wiener said he does not "subscribe to the view that we should somehow not protect folks from sexual violence by guards unless we also target and demonize trans people,” adding that this is “ridiculous.”
Democrat CA State Senator Scott Wiener DEFENDS men assaulting women in female prisons
Democrats HATE women.pic.twitter.com/v5PwtU3Yx3
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) April 30, 2025
This should not be controversial. Do you need any more evidence that this man despises women? And FYI, this is also the same lawmaker who fought to criminalize intentionally infecting someone with HIV. So, it’s not surprising that this is his viewpoint on this issue.
Even if these self-identified trans individuals truly feel to be women, whatever that even means, why must the left allow for this charade to continue in female prisons? Why are males the only ones deserving of special rights, when females are not only shunned to oblivion, but subjected to horrible abuse, all in the name of progress?
How many more women have to be assaulted before lawmakers decide this is not the compassionate thing to do? Even if this truly was the morally superior course of action, which it absolutely is not, why must we afford these special rights to people already doing time for horrible crimes? That is something the left will never be able to answer, as they slander those they disagree with in perpetuity.
But what else do you expect from the same state that refuses to make it a felony to purchase teens for sex?
In essence, when asked if he was OK with a scenario in which a 16 or 17 year old is sold for sex, "should the purchaser get a felony", he pushed it off, basically saying no, and said the response needs to be "equitable" - yes, you heard that correctly. https://t.co/YWDDYo84ME
— Chef Andrew Gruel (@ChefGruel) April 29, 2025
It's clear Sacramento has no shortage of deranged lawmakers, and that is a scandal in itself. Nevertheless, these people should be doing everything in their power to protect vulnerable individuals, but they have decided to make life much easier for predators. And to call that insane and a lack of remorse to victims everywhere would be an understatement.
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
Latest
Don't Miss