×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
Articles
March 24, 2026
Democrats fight for "appropriately sized" feminine hygiene products in all public men's bathrooms
Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!
Democrat in Maryland calls for “appropriately sized” tampons in MENS bathrooms.
pic.twitter.com/J4S0FnZbxU
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) March 24, 2026
It is unclear what an “appropriately-sized " male tampon is, but it appears that Democrats in Maryland want to mandate that in all public bathrooms. It is unclear what this will accomplish, considering Democrats fail to acknowledge what men will use this for, but the fact that this is up for discussion is a scandal in itself.
According to WBAL:
A bill that would require the availability of tampons and other hygiene products in both men's and women's bathrooms in public buildings is receiving mixed reactions.
Many people wonder why tampons need to be available in men's bathrooms.
According to every medical document to ever exist, men do not need tampons. So, it begs the question: Why are democrats trying to fix a problem that does not exist?
Critics, like the Republican Freedom Caucus, took a jab at the bill with a nickname. The legislation has strong support, but public opinion is mixed.
The Republican Freedom Caucus opposes the measure. They took a jab at the bill with a nickname.
"So, I've dubbed this bill, 'Tampons for Timmy,' because it explains what this bill does. This bill puts tampons in men's bathrooms across the state in Maryland — including the Ravens' stadium, Oriole Park, men's prisons. I just think it's very, very expensive — and most importantly, totally unnecessary."
Just to start the program, it would cost nearly $400,000. That is a lot of money wasted under the fake guise of being inclusive.
Several state agencies, without officially opposing the bill, expressed concern about the cost of carrying it out. For example, the Department of Natural Resources estimates start-up costs alone would be nearly $400,000.
While Democrats love to pretend they are on the side of compassion, they are faking virtue where none exists. Unclear if this will pass, but fortunately, most people are not buying this fake pursuit of whatever in the name of wokeness this is. However, the fact that this bill even exists is a problem in itself.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Latest
Don't Miss




