Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Check out our Election 2026 Dashboard to keep track ot the upcoming midterms!

The problem with the jury in the Lindsay Clancy case is that, based on post-trial interviews, they were nothing but pathetic activists who could not care less about getting justice for the kids. Following the mistrial, several boomer jurors took to the fake news media to bash the lone juror, who just so happens to have been the only Black man on the jury and the only person with common sense, and to claim he was too incompetent to follow the law. The juror has officially broken his silence, and to claim he followed the law much more than anyone on the jury would be an understatement.

He claims the evidence proved Clancy knew exactly what she was doing. In fact, he believes she planned the whole thing. This is more than enough reason to vote guilty. The fact that the left has turned this into a fake feminism issue about fake postpartum psychosis that Clancy, arguably, did not have, tells you all you need to know because clearly, the jury was not “following the law on reasonable doubt.”

Per Fox 10:

The trial ended in a mistrial after the 12-person jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict. The holdout juror, identified as Michael P. Desronvil, released a statement explaining why he remained convinced that Clancy should have been found guilty.

Desronvil’s account differs from those of several other jurors who spoke publicly in the days after the mistrial. They said Desronvil appeared to acknowledge having reasonable doubt during deliberations but still refused to join the other 11 jurors in finding Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity.

"Rest assured that the evil people who have so viciously attacked this American Hero and Champion of Justice will be held accountable to the maximum extent of the law and beyond," Paltzik said. "In the meantime, though, he has persevered and remains utterly unbroken thanks to his devout Catholic Faith."

It is great that he has not let the backlash or intimidation get to him.

Per his statement:

I didn't have any doubts. As I tried to explain different possible theories during deliberation, I kept getting cut off as if I had doubts based on the evidence presented. Based on all the physical evidence, key witnesses, and what the prosecution presented, I thought it was enough proof that she (Clancy) knew exactly what she was doing and planned.

I wasn't on the jury, and I, too, had zero doubts that she planned the whole thing. That is just my two cents, though. I am no White liberal boomer woman, whatever that even is, fighting to ensure postpartum care is talked about.

Per Paula Devlin’s comments:

Yeah, that tells you all you need to know, doesn't it?

- YouTube www.youtube.com