
PoliticsNovember 04, 2026
Commission balances trans pandering with allowing spas to ban people based on "genital characteristics"
Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!
Check out our Election 2026 Dashboard to keep track ot the upcoming midterms!
This story should not exist because, for the vast majority of history, this went without saying. Leftists, however, woke up one day and decided that men should be allowed in women-only spaces so long as they claim to feel some type of way. A commission has now given the OK for businesses to exclude these deranged and predatory practices. Again, the fact that this had to be done is the problem.
EXCLUSIVE: The Washington Human Rights Commission voted to amend state code so businesses that "require nudity as a central purpose...may maintain a rule that entry to spaces where nudity is required be based on genital characteristics."The commission did this on an emergency basis "to address pending litigation," likely from the lawsuits regarding single gender spasThe commission added, "We are very committed to protecting transgender rights"The attorney general's office must now file the rule change. Right now, the law still says "all entities shall allow individuals the use of facilities consistent with the person's gender expression or identity," including locker rooms.
— Ari Hoffman (@thehoffather) November 2, 2026
According to The Post Millennial:
After spending years harassing a Christian-owned Korean women’s spa over its refusal to admit patrons with male genitalia, the Washington State Human Rights Commission has approved an emergency exception that appears to permit the very restriction at the center of the legal battle.
So, they didn't do this because they felt it needed to be done. They did it because of a legal battle. That tells you all you need to know.
Olympus Spa has asked the US Supreme Court to review the commission’s enforcement, and Washington faces a December 4 deadline to respond. The commission voted October 22 to change its rules, explicitly citing pending litigation.
Do you need any more proof of how misogynistic these people are?
The proposed addition to WAC 162-32-060 states: “In the limited circumstance where a business requires nudity as a central purpose of the business, such business may maintain a rule that entry to spaces where nudity is required be based on genital characteristics.”
Again, the fact that it took this long and this much of a battle to make this happen is part of the scandal here. This should not have to be written into a municipal code because, for all of history, this was already acceptable practice. The left pretending it is the other side who is bigoted when their policies put businesses and women at risk for such predatory practices is infuriating, to say the very least.
Men are men and should not be allowed in female-only spaces, especially “where nudity is required” to enter that place of business. These people are such a disgrace.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Latest


![Three words for conservative media: It's. All. Offense! [Video]](https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/media-library/image.png?id=68596457&width=1200&height=800&quality=71&coordinates=195%2C0%2C195%2C0)


