Jury Rules Against Father Protecting 7-Year Old Son from Forced 'Transitioning'
In 2019, it should not be a controversial opinion to say that a seven-year-old boy shouldn't be forced into transitioning into a girl. It shouldn't be, yet we all find ourselves right here (see Transgenders ‘Detransitioning’ on the Rise. And the LGBTQ Community Isn’t Helping. and Father Shares Heartbreaking Story of Son Who’s ‘Transitioning.’ And He’s Powerless to Stop It.). A jury just ruled against a father trying to stop his son's mother from turning the boy into "Luna."
A jury has ruled against Jeffrey Younger, the father who is trying to protect his seven-year-old son, James, from chemical castration via a gender “transition.” This means James’ mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, will be able to continue “transitioning” him into “Luna,” and now has full authority to start him on puberty blockers and eventually cross-sex hormones.
We're talking about a seven-year-old boy. As in seven. As in isn't even interested in kissing girls, much less being one. As in he's still playing with Legos, Tonka Trucks, even if his mother is forcing on him Ken and Barbie's Malibu Mansion. SEVEN!
The jury’s decision likely means that Mr. Younger will be required to “affirm” James as a girl, despite his religious and moral objections, and will also be forced to take a class on transgenderism.
Oh, so this is happening in the United Kingdom? No. Oh so this is happening in Canada, Justin Trudeau's land of milk and black face paint? No. This case is unfolding in Dallas, Texas. Texas, the supposed conservative bastion of rights, lower taxes, and all things 'Murica. So, you know. Let that sink in for a second.
With a consensus of 11 of the 12 jurors, the jury decided not to grant Mr. Younger Sole Managing Conservatorship over his two twin boys.
Now whatever else Mr. Younger is as a parent, whatever else was discussed in the case, we had 11 of 12 Texans who thought it was terrible that a father, whatever kind of father he is, isn't keen on turning his son onto a chemical cocktail which will forever ruin his life. The son's life, you understand? This kid's life is over. It's just a matter of time before he's so pumped full of poison, he won't be able to see straight. Not physical sight, mental.
As for the "mother" here, she deserves not only to have her parental rights removed, I'm not sure I'm against the removal of her ovaries, uterus, and maybe she needs a full frontal lobotomy. See how she feels having her anatomy altered for the sake of it. Perhaps someone should insist she's really not Anne but Andrew. Her consent here doesn't matter. If a child cannot legally consent to having sexual relations, then how the hell can he legally consent to sexual reassignment?
The last and only hope this poor child has is extreme measures. "Friends" of this child's mother need to intervene in order to save this boy. I'm not entirely sure the father needs to be totally out of this picture, if you catch my drift.
A child's life is at stake. He's being sacrificed on the alter of TRANSGENDERDOM MUHAHAHA and he needs to be saved. Now.
