Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Hunter Biden seems to have found a lot of nerve, claiming that Charlie Kirk’s death was beneficial for the MAGA movement—despite failing to realize that this tragic loss serves no one.

I mean, there are so many things wrong with his deranged statements that it’s unclear where to even begin.

Firstly, he has made it clear that he will stand by the notion that anyone even remotely right-wing can’t be seen as a victim. Not only that, but he refuses to admit what everyone knows to be true: Kirk was killed for his political beliefs. This isn’t rocket science, but clearly, Biden’s lack of morals keeps him blind to these very obvious facts.

Secondly, the fact that he compared Kirk to someone like Nick Fuentes is not only a lie but an attempt to slander his legacy by making others believe Kirk was out to harm people.

If I didn’t know any better, I might even say Biden’s is implying that Kirk had it coming—but I do know better, so I’m not going to make that claim.

According to the Daily Caller:

Hunter Biden claimed on the “Wide Awake Podcast” on Nov. 6 that the Sept. 10 assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk benefited President Donald Trump’s Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement.

Even if that were true—which it’s not—how can you not just fully condemn it and leave it at that? What benefit does he gain by saying this? In trying to fully bash the MAGA movement, he is mocking the tragic death of Kirk, and that will never put him on the right side of history.

Many left-wing individuals celebrated the assassination, as shown in a supercut posted by Grabien News founder Tom Elliot. Biden argued on the podcast that it was unclear why Kirk was killed and that MAGA was the beneficiary because it gave them “righteous indignation.”

Biden questioned whether Rubin could know for certain that Kirk was killed for his beliefs, calling it a right-wing narrative. While Rubin said he could not come up with any other reason for the assassination, Biden speculated that the assassin could have been a member of the “groyper” movement aiming simply to cause “chaos.”

“He wasn’t necessarily shot for his beliefs,” Biden said. “He was shot because he was one of the loudest people speaking out there … I don’t know whether Charlie Kirk was shot because of what he believed or whether he was shot by a disaffected white male, an incel that had ready access to a high caliber rifle and the capacity to be able to shoot a kill shot from over 200 yards from a prone from a roof and somehow disassembled the rifle before he got off the roof without it being able to [be] seen on video.”

Even if he “wasn’t necessarily shot for his beliefs” and it was solely because “he was one of the loudest people speaking out there,” that still makes no sense. Aren’t these basically the same thing? In other words, Biden claims it’s not what was said, but how it was said. The logic here is far from logical—and deranged, at best.

Leftists could simply say nothing. They don’t have to use this tragedy to bash the MAGA movement, but clearly, they can’t stand the fact that Kirk is more influential than they could ever hope to be. And while that may be nothing more than a personal issue—and you, quite frankly, would have to be on crack to believe anything this guy says—it’s still wrong in so many ways.

- YouTube www.youtube.com