Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

It’s unclear why so many on the Left suddenly act as if people cannot hold views that differ from their parents, treating them like mere extensions of their families. Even more absurd, they claim Charlie’s suspected killer was supposedly far-right and that he acted as he did because Charlie wasn’t conservative enough.

This is why Marjorie Taylor Greene couldn’t stay silent when Rep. Jasmine Crockett tried to label Tyler Robinson as “MAGA.”

Greene is correct to claim that all the evidence points to the suspected killer as a radical leftist—so much so that he allegedly killed someone simply for engaging in civil debate. There is zero evidence that Tyler was anything but a leftist, especially considering that he lived with his trans partner. Typically, conservatives—especially staunch conservatives—don’t tend to have trans partners or be affiliated with ANTIFA, though that point is secondary to the main issue.

How dumb do they think Americans are to believe that the political violence against Charlie came from the side he supported? That’s completely deranged, and, astonishingly, this is coming from a member of Congress.

Just because “Charlie Kirk suspects Grandma says the family is all MAGA” doesn’t give her the right to start victim-blaming him, and it’s completely reprehensible that she dared to do so. Nonetheless, it’s almost as if the facts of the situation don’t matter to these people—they’ll reach a conclusion first and then twist and dance around the premise. In doing so, they only prove how illogical the radical Left truly is.

That being said, anyone with even half a brain can see exactly which side the suspected killer was on—and it certainly wasn’t Charlie’s. You might assume this should be obvious to Crockett, but apparently, her reasoning skills fall well below those of a goldfish, which explains why this story exists.

- YouTube www.youtube.com