One of the most infuriating things the left does is claim that it’s the other side that has been radicalized. And while sure, there are radicalized people on both the right and the left, believing in gender is certainly not what I would call “radical.” This is especially true when you realize that, until very recently, every single human being on Earth knew that men were men and women were women. So, it makes zero sense why Sir Stephen Fry, who narrated the Harry Potter series, is pretending as if J.K. Rowling is a “lost cause.”

According to Fry, Rowling "has been radicalized" and that it's possible "she has been radicalized by TERFs, but also by the vitriol that is thrown at her."

I will be honest with you, I had to Google what Term means, and in case you are out of the loop like me, it means “Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist.” Or in other words, women standing up against the invisible patriarchy that the left pretends to represent.

According to the Daily Mail:

The comedian and television presenter, who previously hosted QI, told how he used to have dinner regularly with the author and described her views towards the trans community as 'strange'.

LOL. I think we all know who the “strange” one is, and it most certainly is not Rowling.

Recording podcast The Show People last week, Sir Stephen, who is himself gay, said: 'She has been radicalised I fear and it may be she has been radicalised by TERFs, but also by the vitriol that is thrown at her.

'It is unhelpful and only hardens her and will only continue to harden her I am afraid. I am not saying that she not be called out when she says things that are really cruel, wrong and mocking. She seems to be a lost cause for us.'

Sir Stephen recorded audio books for all seven of the Harry Potter series, but has now turned his back on the author, accusing her of 'mocking' LGBT+ people and insisting he supports the trans community.

So, I just looked up every single statement, social media post, and thought Rowling has ever had, and I am having trouble finding the part where she’s mocking people for identifying with the rainbow mob. The least he can do is provide some evidence for that, but clearly, he’s jumping on baseless talking points, while proving he’s just another misogynistic leftist who despises when women speak out against the status quo.

'I disagree profoundly with her on this subject. I am angry she does not disavow some of the more revolting and truly horrible, destructive violently destructive things that people say. She does not attack those at all.

In other words, this man is PISSED because Rowling has the nevre to think for herself. You truly cannot make this level of insanity and bigotry up.

'She says things that are inflammatory and contemptuous, mocking and add to a terribly distressing time for trans people.

LOL. That sounds like nothing more than a personal problem, and the sooner he realizes that, the better off he will be. Nonetheless, he has proven to be anything but open-minded, and it’s comical that he thinks he’s being compassionate by mocking a woman for reasons that are neither logical nor moral. Calling that misogynistic would actually be an understatement.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com