The only thing worse than a crime against a child is a crime against an elderly person. Although this story is not necessarily a crime, it’s a disgraceful act against an elderly person and we are not here for it.

A 90-year-old woman was asked to step down from her volunteer position of 60 years, which is ⅔ of her life because she asked for “clarity” on the whole pronoun debacle. She didn’t even try to be disrespectful, she was generally confused. But the woke mob cannot even begin to deal with someone who asks for “clarity” because they don’t even know how to clarify that nonsense.

According to The New York Post:

An elderly California woman claims she was forced to step down from her volunteer position of 60 years after she asked for clarity on the use of pronouns.

Fran Itkoff, the 90-year-old leader of the Lakewood/Long Beach Self-Help Group, was told her organization would no longer be affiliated with the National MS Society after her “failure to abide by our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion guidelines.”

Itkoff, who has won multiple awards for her and her husband’s work with the organization, became confused one day after she saw several people sign their emails and letters with their names along with their chosen pronouns.

“I was confused, I didn’t know what it was, what it meant,” Itkoff told the social media account Libs of TikTok. “I’ve seen it on a couple of letters that had come in after the person’s name they had the pronouns, but I didn’t know what that meant.”

As Itkoff noticed the pronouns more often, she asked one of the society’s representatives what it meant.”

“Finally I was talking to her and thought I would ask ‘what does it mean’ and let her tell me,” Itkoff said. “She said that it meant ‘they were all-inclusive,’ which didn’t make sense to me.”

Itkoff was confused about how the “she/her” pronouns could be labeled as “all-inclusive” if it was referring to females and not males.

These people claim to be “inclusive” but then go and exclude an elderly lady because she was generally trying to understand a concept that did not exist until like 5 years ago. They did not have trans people back then. These people are so pathetic.

Their reasoning for firing her was that she did not follow their diversity policy, but again I doubt they gave any “clarity.”

Itkoff was confused about Hamilton pointed out the irony in the statement as they were excluding a “90-year-old disabled woman who volunteered for over 60 years.” the “she/her” pronouns could be labeled as “all-inclusive” if it was referring to females and not males.

Oh, look. They are also abeletist.

This is how narcissistic these people are. They think their self-worth is so incredibly important that they cannot even be bothered to attempt to explain their asinine ideology. But that really sums up the left, doesn't it?

Do you think this is what progressives means when they scream “tolerance?” Because I think this is exactly what they mean.

GTFO: Florida BANS Gender Pronouns! | Louder With Crowderwww.youtube.com