Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Check out our Election 2026 Dashboard to keep track ot the upcoming midterms!

Lindsay Clancy juror Paula Devlin continues her little media tour. She likes the attention. Clearly. But what is such a profound realization, however, is how the 11 lunatics on the jury claimed the lone holdout was not following the law on reasonable doubt, when much of their justification for the insanity defense was not based in law.

Speaking with NBC 10, Devlin claimed, “Lindsay's decline was so fast. And we really thought this was an opportunity to get people talking. That's all we really thought. Get people talking.” The problem with this claim is that this was not her job. She was tasked with reaching a verdict based solely on the evidence. Nowhere in her mandate did it claim she was tasked with getting people “talking.” Is she really that stupid?

She also claimed that many people on the jury planned to get together to do one big fake news media interview about fake postpartum issues that don't really exist. And while I am not saying postpartum depression or anxiety do not exist, I am saying that nothing more needs to be done, at least on a societal level, to address these personal problems. Additionally, is she implying that postpartum mental decline is somehow justification for what Clancy did? The depravity is so depraved with this one. And the fact that she pretends she was the least bit impartial is a total joke.

Maybe one day Devlin will fight for the three kids Clancy killed, but until then, do not expect anything more than fake postpartum activism. What a total joke.

- YouTube www.youtube.com