Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Just when you thought California Democrats could not trash parental rights any more than they already have, they come in ready to beat everybody’s expectations.

Assembly Bill 1967 is working its way through the California Legislature. This bill would allow a child, regardless of their age, “to initiate state dependency proceedings against their own parents.” It is unclear why there is such a need for this, but if you guessed the justification may or may not have something to do with the rainbow mob, you would be correct.

Per The Post Millennial:

The bill allows any minor residing in any residential facility to file a legal application against their parents, without cause or evidence of harm.

Residential facilities include drug rehabilitation programs, boarding schools, wilderness therapy programs, faith-based residential programs, and runaway shelters It does not matter whether the facility is safe and an appropriate placement chosen by the parents. The child can petition the court to strip the parents of custodial authority and substitute county child welfare control or foster placement. The application need not be corroborated by any adult and need not be served on the parents. The child’s statement alone is sufficient to trigger a mandatory assessment of the parents’ home. This assessment can occur without the parents’ knowledge.

The investigation includes a social worker assessment of the parents’ home. The use of the word “assessment” instead of “investigation” is legally significant: an assessment carries no requirement of a physical home visit and can be completed entirely on the basis of the child’s statements alone, without the parents ever being contacted.

To qualify, a child must accuse a parent of emotional or physical abuse. This emotional abuse can include not affirming a child's gender delusion.

A parent who refuses to call a daughter a boy may qualify. A child in a pro-reality therapeutic setting can use AB 1967 to move herself into a home or institution that will affirm her transgender identity.

If you are surprised by this, you are not paying attention. We are talking about a state that does not believe the parents ought to have a right to know if their kid socially transitions. These people believe they know what is in the best interest of the child and will happily subject the state’s youth to medically unnecessary Frankenstein procedures all under the guise of affirming delusional feelings. It truly is insane.

It is unclear why California lawmakers hate parents so much, but it likely has to do with the fact that they stand in the way of the left’s trans revolution. You can draw your own conclusions, but it is a bit of a coincidence how these proposed bills almost always have a thing or two to do with affirming trans feelings. Why do you think that is?

- YouTube www.youtube.com