The problem with words like “equity” is that it places guilt on a large majority of the population because of nothing more than insignificant birth traits. This, combined with asinine phrases intended to mislead the masses and drastically change society, has only alienated much of the sane population.

This is why many party members are now begging the Dems to stop using words and phrases like "oligarchs" and "justice-involved populations.”

According to the Washington Post:

Maybe it’s using the word “oligarchs” instead of rich people. Or referring to “people experiencing food insecurity” rather than Americans going hungry. Or “equity” in place of “equality,” or “justice-involved populations” instead of prisoners.

Why must Democrats always out-woke themselves? Is the reason they can’t speak like normal people due to an intent to mislead the population? Because I think that is exactly what it is.

Additionally, these words are not only used to create fake victim classes, but they’re also intended to blame those who have nothing to do with it.

There is no reason we should change words like felon or convicts into “justice-involved populations,” as this not only intends to humanize those who have been convicted of crimes, but it’s a slap in the face to crime victims everywhere.

There is no reason to say things like “unhoused,” as the problem has nothing to do with a lack of housing.

There is no reason to use the word “equity,” as that is a socialist term intended to create a mass level of poverty that they dub as “equal.”

So, not only do these people not talk like normal folks, but every word is intended to drastically change society.

“Justice-involved individuals” is only used by people who want to defund the police or do away with the prison system.

Probably the newest term they use is “oligarchs,” and this is especially pathetic because the Democrats are funded by the ultra wealthy, so much so that they had invisible donors decide on the presidential candidate with zero input from voters.

As Democrats wrestle with who to be in the era of President Donald Trump, a growing group of party members — especially centrists — is reviving the argument that Democrats need to rethink the words they use to talk with the voters whose trust they need to regain.

They contend that liberal candidates too often use language from elite, highly educated circles that suggests the speakers consider themselves smart and virtuous, while casting implied judgment on those who speak more plainly — hardly a formula for winning people over, they say.

The latest debate is, in part, also a proxy for the bigger battle over what the Democrats’ identity should be in the aftermath of November’s devastating losses — especially as the party searches for ways to reverse its overwhelming rejection by rural and White working-class voters.

While it’s true that using these words and phrases won’t appeal to swing voters in middle America, it’s doubtful that this will save them. And despite having double standards to the fullest extent, actions speak louder than words.

These people can lie and pretend they are as moderate as a liberal from the 80s, but Americans have a memory that is far greater than a goldfish. These people have made the lives of Americans worse off, so much so that far too many are struggling to make ends meet, and no language revision is going to change that.

Language can change minds, but it just so happens it had the opposite effect than the left intended. Thus, they could not be more pathetic if they tried.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com