When Boston Mayor Michelle Wu is not holding a holiday party for “electeds of color,” when she’s not offering citizenship to the entire global population of 7.8 billion people, and when she is not working for LGBTQ+ Advancement, she is doing what she can to make sure she creates a culture of lawlessness because laws are racist. Duh.

Wu indicated that she supports shutting down the Boston Police gang database, enacting a do-not-prosecute list, and decriminalizing shoplifting, possession, possession with intent to distribute, breaking and entering with property damage, malicious destruction of property, and more.

She also thinks that the police department should be “demilitarized,” whatever that even means.

According to Fox News:

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu advocated a soft-on-crime agenda by pushing to abolish the gang registry and arguing that criminal behavior – such as theft – should not be prosecuted.

Question: Besides gang members, who would that benefit? And besides vulnerable people, who would not hurt?

Prior to being elected mayor, Wu filled out the "2021 Boston Mayoral Candidate Questionnaire" from Progressive Massachusetts, a 501c4 nonprofit organization that tracks and ranks how progressive elected officials are. According to its website, the group "intends to transform Massachusetts into a bold laboratory for progressive state initiatives."

Then, Wu was asked whether she supported a do-not-prosecute list enacted by the former Suffolk County district attorney, Rachael Rollins.

So how would one qualify to be on the “do-not-prosecute list” and would that mean they have immunity from alllllllll prosecutions or what? Because there’s this little thing called “equal justice under the law” and it seems as if many progressive officials have forgotten about that.

DA Rollins enacted the policy memo identifying more than a dozen charges she said should be declined for prosecution. Those crimes included shoplifting, larceny, disorderly conduct, receiving stolen property, driving with a suspended license, breaking and entering with property damage, wanton and malicious destruction of property, threats, minor in possession of alcohol, marijuana possession, possession with intent to distribute, non-marijuana drug possession.

Coincidentally, Rollins was found to have committed “‘egregious’ ethical violations and ‘abuse of power.’" But that’s just a coincidence. Don’t think that only a criminal would support pro-criminal policies. This has absolutely nothing to do with that.

Again, who would any of that help? Because I am having a hard time seeing how this would benefit law-abiding citizens. Do Americans no longer get to enjoy little things like public safety and if not, what would their tax dollars be spent on? More "blatant disregard for public finance rules" when it comes to holiday party spending for electeds of color?

There’s no way anyone can rationalize any of this if their goal wasn’t utter chaos.

Progressive don’t even try to hide their insanity anymore. Is it even possible to be this naive? There’s no way Wu thinks this is supposedly going to solve the invisible racism epidemic once and for all. Because if she did believe that then it’s unclear if it’s legal for someone this objectively stupid to run for office. But even if it wasn't, it’s not like she would care considering she has announced she doesn't like little things called “laws.”

If someone destroys property with malicious intent why shouldn't they be prosecuted? And are we supposed to assume that if someone were to destroy her house that person would also be let go? Because I beg to differ.

Progressives are completely unhinged. They will lock up law-abiding citizens in their homes as they attempt to control an invisible virus, while they refuse to lock up criminals. To say they have their priorities backward would be an understatement.

These people are so stupid that they will even claim that holding people accountable does nothing for recidivism rates. They literally invented the term “painfully stupid.”

Question: How many people will have to be victimized before we reach progressive utopia?

Literally, these people have two jobs. Protect law and order and protect our freedoms. So can someone tell them that?

The worst part about all of this is that Boston residents will STILL vote her back in as if their health depends on it. And the only thing worse than a progressive politician is progressive voters who suffer from Stockholm syndrome.

Pro Segregation Boston Mayor Won't Allow Whites To Attend Christmas Party!www.youtube.com