Andrea Mitchell scolds reporter for saying "Pro-Life" and it gets awkward
MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell made things a tad awkward yesterday when she decided to lecture a reporter for using the term "pro-life." Mitchell claimed it "is a term that they - an entire group wants to use, but that's not an accurate description."
\u201cAndrea Mitchell chides a reporter for using the term "pro-life"\n\n"Let me just interrupt and say that pro-life is a term that they\u2014an entire group wants to use, but that's not an accurate description."\n\nReporter: "I\u2019m using it because it\u2019s the term she used to describe herself."\u201d— Washington Free Beacon (@Washington Free Beacon) 1673544619
It always boggles my mind when leftists claim pro-lifers don't care about the child after it's born, then proceed to firebomb the crisis pregnancy centers that...care about the child after it's born. In fact, over 200 House Democrats just voted against condemning the attacks on crisis pregnancy centers and churches that have occurred since the leaked Dobbs decision.
\u201cBREAKING: The House just passed a resolution condemning the 78 attacks on pro-life pregnancy centers and over 100 attacks on churches in the last 7 months since the Dobbs decision leak.\n\nOnly three Democrats voted in favor.\u201d— Greg Price (@Greg Price) 1673473769
Lefties also tend to claim pro-lifers aren't actually pro-life since many support the death penalty and gun rights as well. Because nothing screams "hatred of innocent life" like executing the most abhorrent criminals and allowing civilians to defend themselves against tyranny.
Meanwhile, over 200 Democrats in the House of Representatives just voted against the "Born Alive Infants Protection Act." With so many Democrats opposing, this must be more of that right-wing propaganda, right? Surely, that many Democrats can't be that evil?
Oh no. They are.
The bill would require doctors to provide life-saving care for babies who survive attempted abortions. Nancy Pelosi called the bill an "extreme anti-choice agenda."
Jerry Nadler claimed, "The problem with this bill is that it endangers some infants [born alive] by stating that that infant must immediately be brought to the hospital."
That math doesn't really check out, since the endangerment of infants comes during the abortion intended to kill them.
\u201cNadler on the bill to ban killing babies born alive: "The problem with this bill is that it endangers some infants [born alive] by stating that that infant must immediately be brought to the hospital."\u201d— Greg Price (@Greg Price) 1673465664
Rep. Hillary Scholten claimed to be a "pro-choice Christian who chose life" and cleverly pointed out that the Bible doesn't say God knitted babies together in the GOVERNMENT'S womb!
\u201cRep. Hillary Scholten (D-MI): "As a pro-choice Christian who chose life, this issue is personal to me... When I read scripture, I turn to Jeremiah 1:5 which states 'I knew you before I formed you and placed you in your mother's womb.' It doesn't say the government's womb."\u201d— Greg Price (@Greg Price) 1673466702
I don't think she made the intended point with that statement. Luckily, the bill passed, despite all these genius Democrats who voted against it. It will likely not make it through the Senate, unfortunately, but at least Republicans were able to express their desire to refrain from killing babies.
LwC is on Substack now! Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.. but algorithms hide our ranting and raving as best they can. The best way to stick it to Big Tech? Subscribe to For the Content!
The Truth About Kansas' Abortion Bill... | Louder With Crowderyoutu.be