University of Colorado Actually BANS Students From Questioning Climate Change...
We've talked about climate change quite a bit here at LwC. Mostly how it's a steaming pile of non-global-warming-endangered horse crap. Not merely for its inaccuracies though. Ever notice how almost every climate changer and their bald-headed granny demands everyone believe in climate change? (read Democrat Attorneys General Want to Punish 'Climate Change Deniers' to the 'Full Extent of the Law.')
Enter the University of Colorado. Don't believe in climate change? Drop your humanities class.
Three professors co-teaching an online course called "Medical Humanities in the Digital Age" at the University of Colorado-Colorado Springs told their students via email that man-made climate change is not open for debate, and those who think otherwise have no place in their course.
"The point of departure for this course is based on the scientific premise that human induced climate change is valid and occurring. We will not, at any time, debate the science of climate change, nor will the 'other side' of the climate change debate be taught or discussed in this course..."
The professors also note this ban on debate extends to discussion among students in online forums.
In other words... No debate. No dissent. Nothing but conformity. Because SCIENCE.
I'll go out on a limb here and state the obvious: Self evident truths don't need to be forced on people. These professors who "banned" the opposing argument? In all shapes and forms? Sounds like a cheap way to ensure there's no ideological competition. Which is something people in power do when their argument is weak. See any dictator that ever lived.
Why climate change dissent gets squashed...
The comparison of climate change alarmists to dictators is an accurate one. If someone has a fragile belief which serves as the foundation of greater political control, any dissent must be squashed. Immediately. Government expansion relies on people's complete faith in government's ability to solve problems. In this case "global warming." But if global warming isn't an actual problem, then government isn't needed to "solve it." Therefore government grants that investigate climate change are not needed. New taxes aren't needed. Regulations aren't needed. Government cannot grow for the sake of "saving the planet" if the planet doesn't need saving.
You climate change deniers? Off with your heads. How dare you question the theocracy of man-made climate change. Don't you understand we need to worship at the altar of big government, who will save us from ourselves? If you disagree, go to jail. Read Fascist Non-Scientist, Bill Nye, Wants to Jail Climate Skeptic REAL Scientists
I thought people go to college to expand their minds? Lack of healthy debate doesn't scream quality education to me. But then again, what do I know? I'm just a climate change denier.