Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

Since when were felons considered a protected class?

Biden’s DOJ has sued Sheetz, Inc. for alleged racial discrimination. The announcement came just one day after Sleepy Joe wandered around a Sheetz location and took a cringe photo op. Since the lawsuit was likely in the works well before this pathetic attempt to convince the masses Biden is liked by the general public, the question on everyone's mind should be “Why did Joe decide to give publicity to an alleged racist organization?”

According to a press release from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission:

Sheetz, a large convenience store chain, violated federal law by denying employment to a class of job applicants because of their race, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed today.

The EEOC filed suit against Sheetz, Inc.; Sheetz Distribution Services, LLC; and CLI Transport, LP (collectively, Sheetz), which together operate a chain of convenience stores with over 600 locations in six states. According to the lawsuit, Sheetz has maintained a longstanding practice of screening all job applicants for records of criminal conviction and then denying them employment based on those records.

The EEOC charges that Sheetz’s hiring practices disproportionately screened out Black, Native American/Alaska Native and multiracial applicants. Sheetz’s companywide hiring practices violated provisions of Title VII that prohibit disparate impact discrimination, the EEOC says. The lawsuit does not allege that Sheetz was motivated by race when making hiring decisions.

In other words, because Sheetz has not met the racial makeup that the Biden administration ambiguously and arbitrarily made up, they are now being sued.

Working at a convenience store typically entails working with money and many felony convictions pertain to financial matters. As the commission said, many people are not considered for jobs within the company once it is revealed they have a criminal record. That is not a racist act in itself, even the bureaucracy has admitted to that in its press release. But because more Black and Native Americans are allegedly affected by this more than White people, we are to believe this is racist. However, if a certain race has more trouble getting a job because they have committed more crimes overall, that sounds like a personal/cultural problem rather than a Sheetz problem.

There are many jobs in the federal bureaucracy that felons are not permitted to have, including the FBI. But for some reason, it is only racist when the little guy does it, and it seems to only be permissible when a bureaucracy engages in this act. Even though by the commission's own words, this would negatively affect minorities and is, therefore, racist.

People can divide others into whatever identity groups they want and no matter what, some groups will always be disproportionately affected. But in the progressive purist of equitable utopia, those identity groups just so happen to be race even though a lack of equity is not racism.

If Biden's bureaucracy is going to use a business for a fake PR stunt, he can at least have the dignity to not do it to one he plans to sue.

VERY SAD! Inside The Plot To Take Down President Trump!www.youtube.com