Liberal Outrage Causes MORE People to Like Trump... Says New York Times?
When it comes to blazing heaps of outrage, there's been no shortage these past few months. Courtesy of social justice gremlins, of course (see Must Watch: Top 5 Anti-Trump Feminist Meltdowns). It seems we've entered an era where we can expect to hear little else from the left beyond political lectures. And angry screeching.
Apparently we're not the only ones to notice. It's beginning to wear on those who find themselves not stomping innocent bystanders in the name of anti-Trumpness (see HuffPo Tries Forcing Buddhist Monks to Trash Trump. Get Schooled Instead...).
Now even the New York Times is questioning if liberals are actually helping Trump with their tantrums. One interviewee explains below...
“We’re backed into a corner,” said Mr. Medford, 46, whose business teaches people to be filmmakers. “There are at least some things about Trump I find to be defensible. But they are saying: ‘Agree with us 100 percent or you are morally bankrupt. You’re an idiot if you support any part of Trump.’ ”
He added: “I didn’t choose a side. They put me on one.”
And Medford isn't alone in this. Look at Dave Rubin, Jake Shields and even look at Chadwick Moore. The more outbursts we see, the more people opt out of leftism. Hence why Trump was elected in the first place (see Crowder UNLOADS: "People voted Trump because Democrats screwed them!").
The moral of the story here? Nobody likes social justice warriors. Not exactly surprising to most regular readers of LwC. We've been watching said SJW's soil their diapers since November. This only furthers the pattern we've seen of liberalism imploding on itself.
But hey, the left is still good at lots of things. Like gender studies and... setting people on fire. Changing hearts and minds? Not so much...