Mike Rowe Destroys -- Line by Line -- Idiot 'The Bulwark' Reporter's Hit Piece Against Him
Mike Rowe is the voice of common sense. The Bulwark is the voice of people who were shoved into lockers as a kid. Mike Rowe administering a beatdown of a The Bulwark hit piece with the precision of a volunteer wielding an mRNA needle is a great way to start your Monday.
For those unfamiliar with The Bulwark, think of the most pathetic, useless, miserable anti-Trumpers imaginable. Now give them their own website. With Trump gone, the writers have segued into saying whatever they need to in order to keep being invited on MSNBC. In this instance, attacking Mike Rowe's common sense take on why he won't tell you what personal medical decisions to make for yourself. He goes against the narrative. Jonathan V. Last got chirpy about what he called Rowe's "dirty lies." Rowe wrecked his face by countering his piece line by line.
Click through, because Mike Rowe destroying a hater should be enjoyed in Mike's own words. I'll give you a hint. In order for Last to claim Rowe was a liar lying about the v*cc*ne, he omitted all the parts from Rowe's original post where Rowe said a) he got the Fauci Ouchie, and b) v-word's work. Two points I wanted to highlight.
Mike: Also, I'm puzzled by your sub-head. If "anti-v*xx" means I'm against vaccines, "anti-anti-v*xx" would mean I'm for v*ccines, right? So, wouldn't "anti-anti-anti-v*xx" mean I'm against vaccines?
Hi Mike, I think I can explain this. He's speaking in Political-Twittereese. It starts with people being Anti-Trump. When conservatives who weren't enamored by the former president would attack Anti-Trumpers for being useless losers, those useless losers would label us anti-anti-Trump. Then at some point, another anti- was thrown in front of the two other anti-'s. People would then throw random anti's in front of words when they had no other argument. You obviously have too much of a life you enjoy to have been aware of this. I wish I did.
Mike: What's reprehensible, and cowardly, is your attempt to mischaracterize what I wrote, and deliberately misinform your readers. If I really wanted to discourage people from getting v*cc*ated, why would I admit to getting v*cc*nated myself? And why would I write the passage you deliberately omitted? Here it is again, lest your readers forget it. "V*cc*nes have saved more lives than any other advancement in the long history of medicine, and to your point, I got the shots the minute I was eligible.
Hi Mike. If I were to guess, Last mischaracterizing you is similar to why Joe Biden says Facebook is an accessory to murder because of 12 people sharing memes. Or why people get boo-boo-faced over Joe Rogan, like you, expressing an opinion on the internet. It's less about the Fauci Ouchie as much as it is about people not blindly doing what the federal government tells you to do. These are the same leftists who feel if you have a platform, you should only be allowed to use it to promote the leftist agenda. Rowe doesn't use his platform for that. Hence, hit pieces lying about what he actually said.
If this were about v-word hesitancy and getting shots into arms, the Biden White House and their fanbois at The Bulwark would look at the last few weeks of THEIR failed messaging and wonder if it was something they said. Most recently, the White House said we should shut up and listen to our public health advisors. Then when one of Biden's public health advisors says that common masks don't work, we're told "no, don't listen to that guy. Only listen to the federal government."
Even though Rowe falls in line with most Americans. He made a personal health decision for himself. He's not going to tell you what you should do.
Get your content free from Big Tech's filter. Bookmark this website and sign up for our newsletter!
Part 2 | I'm Getting Heart Surgery #shorts #louderwithcrowder youtu.be