The movement to erase women reached new levels of insanity.

We all know life has turned into one big costume party. But usually, we report about the patriarchy taking things away from women. However, this time the balls are in someone else's court. As it turns out, you can’t spell “woman” without “man” and there was no man so great this year than Kim Kardashian HERself.

GQ honored Kardashian by putting her on the cover of their “2023 Men of the Year” issue. But this makes sense since Caitlyn Jenner became Woman of the Year not even 12 months after being a woman. But to be fair, Jenner was behind the wheel during a crash that killed someone. Kardashian only pulled a Jada Pinkett Smith on Kanye. The two are very different things so we can’t compare the two.

Honestly, they played their hands too hard with this one since I doubt the magazine will please either side. Conservatives will be mad because they are not only trying to make gender de facto meaningless, but by doing so, they contribute to the erasure of “women.” And we know that the progressives are going to get mad since they made a woman a man before a trans man a man.

You really can be too woke to function.

Also, this says a lot since Kim just got her kids a male nanny to replace Kanye because they needed a father figure in their lives. But don’t worry because I am sure a “manny” alongside her being the man of the hour will fix that void.

And no, I don’t think this is a “trans men are men” sort of thing. I wouldn’t be surprised if Mommy Kardashian just worked her witchcraft here. Plus that magazine has been trash for the past several years and this seems more of a “gender is meaningless” sort of thing, I think? One thing we know for sure is that if you are a straight male, you are no longer the demographic for GQ.

Because let’s be real, there are things women want to read and there are things men want to read.

Kardashian appeared on the cover wearing a suit and tie while snacking on a bag of Cheetos Puffs as she licked the dust from her fingers. Although Cheetos puffs are 10x better than regular Cheetos, this does not make it okay. Everyone knows you are supposed to eat Cheetos products in the privacy of your own home due to how gross your fingers get. It is definitely a home snack, just like pears are a home fruit.

I am assuming Cheetos paid for the photo shoot so none of that matters anyway. But was that really the most “masculine” chip GQ could find?

Kardashian had enough excitement for all of us since no one else cared. Well, at least no one reading this cares.

“Hi! I’m the GQ Man of the Year!” Kardashian wrote Tuesday on X.

According to Men's Journal, Kardashian was named the “Tycoon of the Year '' because Skims is starting a menswear line. The underwear was recently made the official undergarment of the NBA. Kardashian also said men have similar body insecurities to women and she “wanted men to find out what all the hype is about.”

I guess GQ is so progressive they are conflating “man” with wealth. And Men definitely don’t have the same insecurities as women but I guess that's more of a marketing statement anyway.

Does it take a middle-aged white woman to tell a man what he is insecure about? I don’t think so but I guess mansplaining is only okay when a woman does it.

Also included in the magazine’s special edition was a spread that showcased her wearing more clothes than usual for the former porn star, alongside an in-depth interview where she discussed her entrepreneurial influences.

Travis Scott, Tom Ford, and Jacob Elordi were also named Man of the Year alongside Kardashian.

All I am going to say is that men typically don’t get rich and famous by recording themselves doing ‘you know what’ with other men.

That said, it is very important that no one forgets that this is the same Kardashian who still supports Balenciaga after that pedophile/bondage fiasco.