×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
Politics
August 10, 2026
DSA leader agrees that rape is bad, but isn't sure who to hypothetically call if Democrats defund the police
Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!
DSA National Political Committee Member Frances Gill has confirmed what everyone already knows to be true: The DSA solely intends to defend the police and leave citizens to fend for themselves. However, they don't want you to know that because this is insanely unpopular with the majority of Americans. Subsequently, the only way they can legitimately keep winning is if they deceive the public. And to call that a “threat to Democracy” would be an understatement.
DSA's Frances Gill confirms goal is: defunding police, getting rid of prisons and jails, wants to eradicate crimes by removing "root causes" of what "drive people to commit crimes." pic.twitter.com/js6HtbtPfj
— Libby Emmons (@libbyemmons) August 10, 2026
According to Fox News:
In an interview with NBC 4 Los Angeles, anchor Conan Nolan posed pointed questions to Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) National Political Committee Member Frances Gill on the topics of law enforcement, immigration and the movement's other far-left proposals.
"So if my daughter is assaulted and raped, is there any agency that would seek to find her assailant and bring him to justice?" asked Nolan.
"Of course, yeah of course—" said Gill before the host jumped back in with a follow-up question.
She then implied she did not have the competence to discuss these hypothetical scenarios, despite them being legitimate questions for public safety.
That reality, she said, is the city spending "outrageous amounts on police and policing," instead of addressing real issues plaguing Los Angeles. She suggested that the lack of street lights, substance abuse treatment and mental healthcare are all contributing to a lack of public safety and rise in crime.
In other words, she could not answer any of these questions, as they likely have no plan at all. Because if they did have evidence that their so-called “plan” could actually decrease crime, she would be able to convey that point. The best response she had was to claim we are “funneling money into the police” when giving them zero dollars is a far more feasible option in their eyes. What a bunch of clowns.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Latest




