
×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
PoliticsMay 16, 2026
Elderly Maxine Waters can't say if being 100 years old is too old to be a member of Congress
Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!
The average age of retirement is about 62. The average age of a senator is 64. That tells you all you need to know.
87-year-old Maxine Waters refuses to say 100 is too old for Congress https://t.co/B2PKZeKKeC pic.twitter.com/xeKHn6GTv1
— New York Post (@nypost) May 15, 2026
Maxine Waters is 87 years old. It is unclear if this is why she refuses to admit that being 100 years old means you are very likely unfit to represent the people of this great nation, but one would assume.
🚨 UPDATE: 87-year-old Rep. Maxine Waters (D) just announced she wants literal 100-YEAR-OLDS serving in elected office, with NO form of cognitive tests required
She says NOBODY is too old 🤡
Q: Even a 100-year-old?
WATERS: The people should evaluate with their vote, THAT'S IT.… pic.twitter.com/IX2jRihNuA
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 15, 2026
TMZ asked Waters if we need age limits for Congress. She refused to answer and said that people should vote based on results and competence rather than age.
According to the New York Post:
The 87-year-old congresswoman argued Thursday that voters should judge politicians by “performance and effectiveness” rather than age as she walked into the US Capitol.
“People should evaluate who should be in office with their vote, and that’s it,” Waters said.
“What do they do? What can you document? What can you give them credit for? What can you criticize them for?” Waters said. “If you do what it takes to evaluate, then you can decide.”
The conversation then pivoted towards Trump, of course, and whether or not he was too old. While she did admit he was a threat to Democracy, she danced around the age question.
“The president of the United States is destroying our democracy,” Waters said. “He’s made unkept promises. He is enriching himself and his family with cryptocurrency.”
She accused Trump of being “absolutely committed to empowering himself” and said voters would decide his fate.
“I think some people are having buyer’s remorse, and we see it in the polls,” Waters said. “In the final analysis, it is the people who will finally determine that this president is dangerous and divisive.”
Isn't it comical how she calls him dangerous and divisive when he is the one who won the popular vote? This means that she does not care how she makes over half the country feel by her rhetoric, while she slanders his voters by slandering him.
Will the left ever understand that the whole ‘threat to democracy’ rhetoric was so 2016? No one buys this crap anymore, and someone should really inform her of that.
That being said, Trump is not a threat to democracy, but many of the boomers in Congress are. Some may argue there is no threat greater than 87-year-old Waters herself. And for the record, 100 is too old to serve in Congress, and the fact that she refused to acknowledge that is foolish and not the flex she thinks it is. But what does she care? She is a threat to democracy, and her age surely is not helping her.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Latest





