Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

As you may recall, the left labeled anyone who dared to question election fraud a conspiracy theorist. It turns out, though, that the conspiracy theorists are sometimes right. And when the left claims there is no widespread election fraud, this is one of those instances that is supposedly not widespread.

A woman in California plans to plead guilty to paying homeless people on Skid Row to register to vote. While it is unclear which side this registration favored, it is likely safe to conclude it is the party that rhymes with the word “rats,” but draw your own conclusions.

According to The Post Millennial:

A California woman has been charged and has agreed to plead guilty to paying homeless people to register to vote on Skid Row. The announcement comes after an investigation by O'Keefe Media Group.

According to a press release from the Department of Justice, "Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong, of Marina del Rey, California, 64, also known as 'Anika,' is charged with one felony count of paying another person to register to vote, a federal charge that carries a statutory maximum penalty of five years in federal prison."

Those on the street were getting paid between $2 and $3 to register to vote, according to the footage. The undercover film, posted by O'Keefe, showed 28 instances of people offering the homeless money as well as drugs to bribe them to vote.

Incredible. It did not even cost the election fraudster $100 to register 28 homeless people. You cannot even buy a coffee with that amount of cash. Wow.

This is a problem because there are many instances, especially in local elections, where people have won by fewer votes. This is why it should not be controversial to demand election integrity. At the very least, it prevents things like this from happening in the future. Why does the left work so hard to fight that?

According to the left, voter ID is racist. The left also believes requiring proof of citizenship is sexist. Also, according to the left, it is a threat to Democracy to pass election security legislation. None of these things is factually correct, but it is quite a coincidence how the left does everything in its power to prevent election integrity, isn't it?

Do you think that if the SAVE Act passes, Democrats would struggle to hold on to any power they have left? Again, draw your own conclusions, but still, the story is rather telling, isn't it?

- YouTube www.youtube.com