Just in time for Woman Crush Wednesday, Tulsi Gabbard is suing Hillary von Pantsuit of the Cloth or Something for defamation. You may remember that She Who Lost the 2016 Election hinted that Tulsi just might be a Russian agent. Though the flying she-witch didn't actually use the words "Tulsi is a Russian" it seems pretty clear Tulsi was the object of Hillary's comments in an October 2019 podcast.

As such, Tulsi Gabbard has taken off the white gloves and donned the gauntlets. She filed the defamation suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Wednesday.

If you don't remember what went down all the way back in October, here are Hillary Clinton's original remarks, courtesy of The Hill:

"They're also going to do third party. I'm not making any predictions, but I think they've got their eye on somebody who's currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate," Clinton said.

Now, who do we know running in the Democrat primary who is a she and isn't really a foot soldier of the radical left? I'd rule out Kamala, Pocahontas, and the other gal who I think eats salad with a hair comb. Which leaves us with Tulsi.

"She's the favorite of the Russians, they have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far, and that's assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not, because she's also a Russian asset. Yeah, she's a Russian asset, I mean totally. They know they can't win without a third party candidate," Clinton said.

Because Tulsi is more of a free speech advocate than anyone else in the Democrat Party, seems to me she'd be the most likely to be a third-party candidate, as Jeffrey Epstein's suicider has suggested.

Calling someone a Russian asset, by the way? Lazy. Unoriginal. If Barack Obama were here debating Mitt Romney, he'd make a joke about "the eighties called, they want their foreign policy back." Yet all of a sudden starting four years ago, oh my god the Russians is the de facto talking point and insult every hack cycles through when there's no substance to be had.

In a battle between Tulsi Gabbard and What difference, at this point, does it make? I'm standing behind Tulsi. Not just because she's a Hawaiian sweet roll of hotness, but because she's right to sue Hillary's tentish pantsuit right off. As long as we're spared the actual sight of it.

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT’S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.