Killing polar bears, now, apparently is a crime worthy of death. Why is it that these same people would probably be against the death penalty? Or be pro-choice? Because killing an animal, apparently, is worse than killing a human, nowadays. Unless that human happens to be a convicted terrorist. Sorry, I know it’s confusing. Allow me to simplify it.
Leftist priorities => Polar bear >>> Convicted murderer >>> Human baby.
Firstly, let’s get our facts straight here. Polar bears are the only animal that are known to definitively stalk humans and eat them. Sharks don’t, wolves don’t, spiders don’t, polar bears do. They’re killers. Though that probably means they just need jobs.
Let’s not forget to mention that hunting polar bears is an integral part of the Inuit culture. It’s necessary to their way of life. And it’s highly regulated. So…it’s sanctioned by the law and it’s part of an old culture. Yet lefties deride it. Ethnocentrism, anyone?
This awful hunting is something that’s been going on long before we ever showed up in America. And the polar bears still exist. It’s natural. Not to mention, hunters do more to help keep ecosystems and species safe than any animal rights activists could ever hope to do.
And wait –because here comes the arctic-cold water– polar bear populations are actually increasing! That’s right. The ‘global warming’, the hunting, the foamy-mouthed liberals—none of it can stop the polar population from rising.
So… Just what is so bad about hunting polar bears again?
Yeah, that’s what I thought. Intolerant, bigoted, Inuit-culture-hating liberals found a problem. Surprise. You just want to threaten people and have your own way. Jack-asses.