Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Most people reading this would agree that Charlie Kirk was a “good guy,” to say the very least. I would even go so far as to call this an objective statement. Nonetheless, one would hope that even the most radical leftists who disagree with that would at least respect the man enough not to gaslight random strangers on the street, as if he were anything but that. But that is exactly what Don Lemon tried to do when a NYC woman claimed Kirk was a “good guy” with “good morals.”

Don Lemon has once again proven to the world that there is no low too low for him to stoop.

It has not even been a week since Kirk was murdered for his politically incorrect thoughts, yet Lemon is out there demanding that random strangers affirm he was supposedly “sexist” and “racist.” However, one would also hope that Lemon would provide some evidence for slandering a man who just lost his life—but he won’t, because Kirk was not racist or sexist, despite what the left would like you to believe.

It’s unclear what answer he expected from the people of NYC, but saying anything positive was clearly not on his bingo card, regardless of what happened or what Kirk’s family is going through. This is because Lemon is so arrogant that it would not be surprising if he believed he could change Kirk’s legacy. But he cannot, because Kirk was far more influential than Lemon could ever hope to be. This is why he’s out there begging strangers to affirm his opinions about a man who was unjustly murdered.

The woman said she “did not see what everybody else saw” when she watched Kirk’s videos, because he is nothing like what the left claims. And the fact that this surprises Lemon and that he believes you must be “very spiritual” to believe he should not have been murdered tells you everything you need to know about him—he is anything but a “good guy” with “good morals.”

- YouTube www.youtube.com