×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
crimeSeptember 11, 2026
Alleged "male" Lindsay Clancy juror lashes out at the lone chad who refused to let her off for murdering her three kids
Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!
Check out our Election 2026 Dashboard to keep track ot the upcoming midterms!
The majority of those who voted on the Lindsay jury believed she was not guilty by reason of insanity. You can only justify this if you are also insane. There is no other way to look at it. This is what makes it exceptionally ridiculous for one of the three male jurors to come forward and claim the lone dissenting vote could not be backed by “evidence.” There is tons of evidence that she is criminally responsible, including the fact that she admitted to killing her children. But you can draw your own conclusions.
Lindsay Clancy holdout juror offered 'not a single piece of evidence' for his vote, fellow juror says https://t.co/yhhQtWcUkV pic.twitter.com/SQqT0TFV8f
— New York Post (@nypost) September 10, 2026
These people who continue to come forward prove just how pathetic and foolish they truly are.
Per the New York Post:
“There wasn’t a single piece of evidence or witness testimony that he used to prove why he was thinking the way he was,” juror Nick Dargie told ABC News in an interview Wednesday.
Some may argue that there was more than enough evidence to prove she was in control of her actions at the time of the killing. This includes arguments that she planned the entire thing, including researching how long it would take her husband to pick up the food. Again, you can draw your own conclusions, but if you believe there is even some doubt she should not be held criminally liable, then you are factually incorrect based on the evidence presented by the prosecution.
“Otherwise, like there’s nothing wrong with somebody having a completely opposite opinion … that would be a hung jury. That, like that, is our justice system,” Dargie added.
What a joke.
“There were several times I would ask him to show us evidence or, you know, describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and … he couldn’t,” Dargie, the fifth juror to speak out, told the outlet.
The fact that the one lone juror is the only one who has not come forward to talk to the media tells you all you need to know. To call this whole ordeal a miscarriage of justice would be putting it lightly
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Latest
