×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
ArticlesFebruary 16, 2024
Watch: Assistant principal thinks it's totally fine for 8-year-olds to have access to books referencing pornography
The left has been on a massive propaganda campaign to label conservatives as “book banners” for quite some time now. They like to pretend that these books are harmless. But these books are deranged, abhorrent, and sick, to say the very least. And it is not a good look to condone such evil content. That’s why the left usually lies and pretends that the books contain nothing inappropriate. But in a brazen admission of degeneracy, an assistant principal said that children should access books that contain pornography.
UNBELIEVABLE. Garrett Jones, assistant principal for an elementary school in @AlachuaSchools says he thinks it’s appropriate for 8-year-old kids to be reading p*rnogr*phy and dirty magazines in school. pic.twitter.com/XepjcOjwyb
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 16, 2024
According to The Daily Caller:
An assistant principal said Tuesday that 8-year-olds should be able to access books “referencing pornography and dirty magazines” during a hearing before a school board in Florida.
Terwilliger Elementary School Assistant Principal Garrett Jones was grilled on whether sexual literature should be allowed in schools after the book “Melissa,” featuring a transgender fourth grader, sparked backlash among Alachua County Public Schools, according to a petition about the hearing.
“So you think an eight-year-old would be an appropriate age to be reading about pornography and dirty magazines from school?” one woman asked Jones.
Jones first attempted to dodge the question, stating that “it would open up a conversation that we would have” when asked whether he would find it appropriate if his children brought home the LGBT book. He said that he voted “for the 3 to 5 age group” to be able to access the material, clarifying that children ages 8 to 12 consisted of that demographic.
Unclear if there will be any repercussions for this admission of predatory beliefs by a man working with minors. But I think it’s probably safe to say his job is safe.
At one point in time, these people used to be called “predators” and would never be allowed around children. Now, they are hired to be in charge of “education” for the next generation. It’s unclear what good the school district thinks will come out of that besides manipulating children into this deranged ideology.
Up until like 5 years ago, this sort of material was banned in schools. There was no need to argue about that and it was not a controversial thing. It was common sense. And there was no attempt to slander people as “book banners” because of it.
A school library does not have an unlimited amount of space. There is a process that decides what books should and should not be on those shelves. And by the left’s definition, that would make everyone a book banner. But in reality, you have to "ban" some books simply because you physically have to. But only progressives will fight this hard to get the most abhorrent and inappropriate books around children. And that is not okay.
There has never been an instance where a child has been “groomed” with such content and it has benefited them. These people are truly deranged and have no business being around minors.
Again?! Target Doubles Down with SICK & PERVERTED Kid's Book!www.youtube.com
Latest