Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

At one point, climate alarmists warned that the Earth would get so hot, humanity wouldn’t survive. That never happened. In fact, even left-leaning media now admit we’re in a “cooling period.” This is why, instead of pushing global warming, they’ve shifted to calling it “climate change” — as if the climate hasn’t always been changing.

Calling anyone who disagrees with the left on this issue a conspiracy theorist who doesn’t believe in weather is disingenuous, which is exactly why Joe Rogan had no choice but to fact-check Bernie Sanders into oblivion.

According to The Washington Post:

But fewer people know that burning fossil fuels doesn’t just cause global warming — it also causes global cooling. It is one of the great ironies of climate change that air pollution, which has killed tens of millions, has also curbed some of the worst effects of a warming planet.

According to a 2022 article from The Post, “In 2015, 1 in 6 deaths worldwide stemmed from poor air quality, unsafe water, and toxic chemical pollution. That deadly toll—9 million people each year—has continued unabated through 2019, killing more people than war, terrorism, road injuries, malaria, drugs, and alcohol.”

That’s the source they used to justify blaming you for destroying the atmosphere. Call me crazy, but I’m pretty sure the only way we’ve made real progress in providing clean water and air — and saving lives — is through the use of fossil fuels. So, how can fossil fuels be both the savior and the destroyer of the planet? A

nd if we get rid of fossil fuels, how will we have clean air and water? That is something leftists could never comprehend.

Tiny particles from the combustion of coal, oil and gas can reflect sunlight and spur the formation of clouds, shading the planet from the sun’s rays. Since the 1980s, those particles have offset between 40 and 80 percent of the warming caused by greenhouse gases.

And now, as society cleans up pollution, that cooling effect is waning. New regulations have cut the amount of sulfur aerosols from global shipping traffic across the oceans; China, fighting its own air pollution problem, has slashed sulfur pollution dramatically in the last decade.

The result is even warmer temperatures — but exactly how much warmer is still under debate. The answer will have lasting impacts on humanity’s ability to meet its climate goals.

How can we be so sure this will have a devastating impact when we don’t even know how much the temperature will change? And do leftists really believe they can change the direction of the wind just by taxing everyday people a little more? I may not have a degree in political science, but I’m pretty sure that’s not how any of this works.

As Rogan put it, “creeps” have been in control for far too long — and the last thing we should do is give them even more power over citizens. And as he said, that’s arguably the most dangerous part of this whole issue. It’s no surprise that the so-called solutions for “controlling the wind” always seem to come at the expense of individual freedom. And to suggest that might be the whole point would be putting it lightly.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com