Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Why does it always seem like progressive priorities put the safety of women at risk everywhere? Oh wait, that’s because they do. Who would have thunk it?

According to Reduxx: “Portugal’s national union for prison staff has threatened to strike after a violent transgender inmate housed in a women’s facility injured five correctional officers.” And if you are surprised by this, you are not paying attention.

The inmate, born Miguel António and now known as “Raquel Teresa,” has since been transferred back to a men’s institution following what officials described as a prolonged campaign of intimidation against female staff and inmates.

According to Sábado, the 48-year-old has been in and out of the prison system since 1993 for a variety of primarily violent offenses. While it is unclear when António began identifying as transgender, Portugal’s Directorate-General for Reintegration and Prison Services (DGRPS) has stated that he has not undergone any medical transition procedures and has only legally changed his name.

In other words, this man is, in fact, a man. Why they allowed him to intimidate female staff and inmates for this long is beyond reason, but it likely has a thing or two to do with the fact that the left would much rather be inclusive than morally or logically correct, despite these actions being exclusive to the majority of women who just want and deserve safety.

Although António’s extensive criminal record is not comprehensively documented, it is known to span both Portugal and France. He was previously convicted in France of several serious crimes, including kidnapping, and served 15 years in prison. Portugal’s national union for prison guards (Sindicato Nacional do Corpo da Guarda Prisional) also reported that António was housed in two women’s prisons in Portugal as early as 2011 after receiving a sentence for rape.

Let me guess. The person he allegedly kidnapped was a woman? While I am not 100% certain of that claim, I think we all know the answer. And one would assume that if that were true, then it would likely also be true that the person he was convicted of raping was a woman. This is truly astonishing—that a man who has likely committed the worst crimes against women was allowed to be housed with more women. Did they even think about it? Or did they not care? I think I am leaning toward the latter.

Even if the left believes men can be women—which they cannot—why even afford these special “rights” to those convicted of the worst crimes known to humanity? That will never be clear, but you can draw whatever conclusions you wish.

We can only hope at this point that this will be the last story of this kind to ever exist, but unfortunately, I think we all know the answer to that. It’s truly unfathomable at this point, yet reprehensible at best.

- YouTube www.youtube.com