If Trump was going to “destroy humanity,” why would he wait until his second term to do it? That is something actor Sean Penn can likely never answer, but that won’t stop him from making those foolish claims.

Penn went on Jim Acosta’s podcast to discuss why world leaders should not “cave” to the Trump Administration and claimed that voters need to ponder "worst-case scenarios" before electing the next president.

According to Fox News:

"I do think it’s a reasonable theory that Donald Trump is not unlike the spouse of someone who leaves him, perhaps for another, who then murders their former partner because if they can’t have her, nobody can," Penn said. "And I think Donald Trump and his solipsism may have that relationship with the world and that this destruction is in part a power play. And also, a literal intention of his final out."

There is no evidence to support such an asinine statement, and the fact that these people waste time on the most absurd conversations proves how unserious these people are.

But for real, who was that comparison even for? What audience is this conversation trying to provoke? Because to buy into it, you’d have to be not only objectively naive about Trump’s first term, but also willingly tuning in to these guys—and that’s a scandal in itself.

When Acosta asked Penn whether he believed Trump intends to try and stay in office after his term is done, Penn remarked, "I think he might try to destroy the world before he ages out of life."

The fact that they’re even spending time discussing whether Trump plans to run for a third term shows how truly clueless they are. They’re so easily fooled by their lies that they genuinely believe Trump is serious when he jokes about running again. Their sheer stupidity is exactly why it’s so easy for Trump to troll people like this. You don’t even have to try—he can make the most blatantly sarcastic remark, like claiming he’ll run for a third term, and they take it as proof that he’s a dictator.

Swalwell appeared to agree with the sentiment by comparing Trump to a dictator and suggested he would "ratchet up" to protect himself before leaving office.

Protect himself against what? That is a meaningless statement intended to rile up the most naive voters, yet they likely can never expand on that. Even Swalwell disproves their lies by claiming dictators don’t tend to have “secession plans.”

So, one again, if Trump never intends to leave office, why did he leave office? The least they can do is back up these statements with some evidence, but they can’t because there isn't any. Thus, they would do themselves a lot of favors if they kept their mouths shut, but they won’t, as that is not possible when you are as arrogant as they are.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com