sss

Does political analyst Tiffany Cross think before she speaks? Does she plan out her arguments beforehand? Does she understand what facts are? It would appear not, because only someone with a fraction of a brain would make the correlation that ICE agents have anything to do with White Supremacy or the Proud Boys.

According to Cross, "There's a reason why we have not seen a resurgence of the Proud Boys,” as she believes “a lot of them are likely ICE officers." She has no evidence for this, other than the fake claim that “multiple ICE agents have white supremacist tattoos.” And when called out about this nonsense by Kevin O'Leary, her rebuttal was that he is “a member of a cult.”

Cross can “believe” anything she wishes, but that does not make her imagination factual. In reality, the Proud Boys have nothing to do with ICE officers, and it’s comical how she makes that claim.

Someone should really inform the left that they don't have to take every passing thought they have as Gospel. Just because her mind threw her a theory, such as the Proud Boys have disbanded to infiltrate ICE, that does not mean she has to believe it or present it to cable news. She would actually do herself a lot of favors if she realized that, but for the left, imagination is equivalent to facts, and reality is not something they take into consideration.

She doubled down, though, and denied her residence in La La Land, as she claims she is "going with my eyes, ears, and logic” to justify that “There have been multiple ICE agents who have white supremacist tattoos.”

But the logic is not very logical with this one; the eyes are not very visual, and her ears are not doing their thing. Because if there were evidence in the real world to suggest that what she is saying is true, she would present that. But she’s not, and resorts solely to “trust me” nonsense.

As O'Leary said, ICE officers are "risking their lives, carrying out a mandate," which makes me have difficulty seeing the correlation between these officers and White Supremacists. I mean, she does realize agents are not a race, right?

The most pathetic thing she said was to claim O'Leary was “part of a cult.” But this is a classic leftist debate tactic. She has nothing to say, nor can she defend her asinine position, which is why she slanders her opponent and half the country as being in a cult. She could have tried to use facts to back up her argument, or lack thereof, but she’s far too arrogant for that. And while she tried to convey whatever argument she tried to convey, she failed miserably. And to call that classical leftism would be an understatement.

- YouTube www.youtube.com