Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

A man who claims he is a woman was fired from a daycare in Letterkenny. He claims it was retaliation against him because he was trans. The evidence, however, paints a different story.

In his first week on the job, the man had two very serious complaints filed against him. A child claimed that Aleena Starshine tried to play a “safari game” with a kid, offering a kiss as a prize. In the second complaint, he released a child without verifying the adult's relationship.

According to Reduxx:

A trans-identified male has lost an employment discrimination case after alleging that he had been wrongfully fired from his job at a childcare center in Letterkenny. The Workplace Relations Commission found that Aleena Starshine had been terminated not due to his gender identity, but as a result of repeat parental complaints and concerns about child safeguarding.

The first complaint pertained to a “safari game” Starshine had organized with the children, during which he offered an 11-year-old child “a free kiss from me” or a “big kiss” as a prize. The child reported this to a parent, who then filed a complaint with the facility. An investigation was launched, and Starshine was confronted about the comment and admitted to making it.

Why am I not surprised that this man is being accused of offering “a free kiss” as a “prize” during a game he made up? This is 100% a fireable offense, and it is deranged that he thought his fake trans status shielded him from accountability.

While not all trans people are like this, it is bizarre how more often than not, trans-identified males seem to make their way into vulnerable places and allegedly prey on potential victims. Why do you think that is?

The next incident involved yet another safeguarding concern in which Starshine reportedly released a child to the care of an adult during a pickup without verifying the adult’s relation to the child or having any other adults present. When confronted, Starshine once again “did not accept that any safeguarding issue arose, instead characterising the practice as normal.”

Again, this is certainly an offense that would be taken seriously for any other employee. This man, however, does not live in reality. He believes because he claims to feel some type of way, he should be afforded special treatment. Again, that is not how reality works. And to claim this man should be barred from ever working around kids would be an understatement.

- YouTube www.youtube.com