• Home
  • Featured
  • Show
  • Posts
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Politics
  • Culture
  • Breaking News
  • International
  • 2020 Election
  • Free Speech
  • Second Amendment
  • Feminism
  • Hollywood
  • Abortion
  • Climate Change
  • Economy
  • Healthcare
  • College
  • Comedy
  • Donald Trump
  • Science
  • LGBT
  • Big Tech
  • Liberal Media
  • Islam
  • Immigration
  • Body Positivity
  • BlazeTV
  • Change My Mind
  • Crowder Confronts
  • Crowder Closes
  • Tough Love
  • Devil's Advocate
  • SJW
  • Fat Pride
  • Socialism
  • Education
  • Sponsored
  • Tyranny
  • COVID-19
  • Police
  • Riots
  • COVID
  • joe biden
  • Log in
HOME
POSTS
ColumnsArticlesShowAll
VIDEOS
ShowAll
PODCAST
SHOP
MUG CLUB
MORE
ScheduleFAQAskJobsContact
Posts
Posts Articles Politics Culture Second Amendment

California Considers Law Restricting Police Firearm Use

Brodigan
April 04, 2018

File this under terrible timing. There's was a highly publicized shooting in California on Tuesday (see YouTube Shooter Identified as Nasim Najafi Aghdam, Angry About Demonetization and  Report: Did Police Drop the Ball Questioning the YouTube Shooter?). Around the same time, California legislators were announcing unprecedented legislation limiting when police can use their firearms.

On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.

The proposed legislation would change the guidance in California’s use of force laws so that police may open fire ”‘only when necessary’ rather than ‘when reasonable,’” Sacramento-based Assemblyman Kevin McCarty (D), said at a press conference Tuesday.

Semantics. It's a semantics change. Changed by people who've never been cops, no doubt.

The legislation is aimed at tackling the reality, as seen in studies, that police kill unarmed black men at disproportionate rates compared to unarmed white men. Supporters of the bill hope raising the standard for when lethal force is permitted will encourage officers to make de-escalation their first line of defense.

Actually, as seen in studies, the exact opposite is true. Also, as seen in studies, there's a major increase in ANTI-police shootings, not "These coppers killing these people of color" shootings.

Here's my biggest problem. It's dangerous enough being a police officer without over-regulating the way the law is enforced. Yes, there are bad cops. No one with a brain is denying that.

But in most dangerous situations, they only have a split second to react. Putting them in a position where they have to second and third guess every decision they make gets people killed. It gets police killed. It gets the people they are trying to protect killed.

So here's a different idea: better police training. Yeah?

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT’S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.

LATEST VIDEO

Congressional Candidate Tries to Ride Elephant Across Mexican Border with Mariachi Band (Flashback)

MORE POSTS

SHOW NOTES: AMERICA LAST! Biden's Extreme Immigration Agenda

CDC Updates COVID Guidelines Allowing 100% Occupancy ... at Biden's Child Migrant Shelters

Dan Crenshaw Illustrates How Stimulus Bill Only Makes Sense Using 'Democrat Math'

Ted Cruz Demands Schools Reopen, Proposes $10000 Scholarship to Students if They Don't

ALL POSTS
NEWSLETTER

Sign up for Louder with Crowder’s FREE newsletter to get the best stories and show updates in your inbox.

© 2020 Blaze Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use