×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
Politics
September 26, 2026
Ms. Rachel attacks Christians, implies Jesus would fight for people to be allowed to purchase junk food with SNAP
Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!
Check out our Election 2026 Dashboard to keep track ot the upcoming midterms!
Ms. Rachel continues to prove how much of a lunatic she truly is. This time, she would like to mock Christians and encourage those on SNAP to purchase Doritos. Yes, she is that delusional.
Speaking on the It's Open podcast with Ilana Glazer, Ms. Rachel said, "If somebody wants to get Cool Ranch Doritos with their SNAP, get a birthday cake and Cool Ranch Doritos."
Ms. Rachel says the "Christian" thing to do is to give people taxpayer-funded SNAP benefits so they can get Cool Ranch Doritos.
"If somebody wants to get Cool Ranch Doritos with their SNAP, get a birthday cake and Cool Ranch Doritos." pic.twitter.com/a4F5iFHItL
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 24, 2026
Wow. She is so stupid.
"The rights of children here, SNAP benefits being taken away, that was so psychotic," Accurso said. "And Rachel, it's like, is it in the name of Christianity to let's be a Christian nation and take away SNAP benefits? Let's be a more Christian nation and put our neighbors and the stranger, which is in the Bible. I was like, right, well, I'm the stranger, but the strangers in detention centers, right?" according to Where is the Buzz.
There are many things wrong with what she said. First, she is either internally disingenuous or painfully stupid. She is implying that if it were up to Republicans, kids would be starving. This is not the case. Ensuring that SNAP benefits, which stands for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, ought to be spent on food that actually resembles food should not be controversial. Additionally, there are many people who barely make ends meet but don't qualify for these benefits, may even skip meals, and cannot afford Doritos. Why is she fighting for the rights of that person's tax dollars to be spent on someone who gets such a handout? Can anyone make it make sense?
And for someone who is also mad that some vague, ambiguous medical claim was denied somewhere for some unknown person, she should be advocating to ban junk food from the program. If we want to promote nutrition and health, the last thing she should be advocating for is Doritos and birthday cake.
The fact that she also chose to go after Christians, despite that having nothing to do with this, is INSANE, to say the very least.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Latest
Don't Miss
