
×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
InternationalOctober 01, 2026
Judge rules it is your constitutional right to *checks notes* illegally traffic drugs
Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!
Check out our Election 2026 Dashboard to keep track ot the upcoming midterms!
In case you were wondering, our northern neighbors are not okay.
A Canadian judge found parts of the country’s Controlled Drugs Act unconstitutional and stayed convictions for the founders of a “compassion club” that allowed members to purchase narcotics.
Canadian judge rules citizens have a constitutional right to traffic drugshttps://t.co/n9wKm9myyw
— Not the Bee (@Not_the_Bee) September 30, 2026
Per the Recovery Research Institute, “Compassion clubs are novel safer supply programs that offer members the ability to purchase drugs that have been tested for potential contamination, increasing safety.” Or, a trusted drug dealer, if you will. And while the left may argue this is far safer than people smoking fentanyl-laced narcotics, common sense would tell you this is unacceptable in a civil society. While you can draw your own conclusions, it is baffling that a judge has decided that some companies have a right to engage in such a practice.
On Tuesday, a B.C. Supreme Court judge found the Drug User Liberation Front's compassion club reduced the harms associated with the toxic drug crisis and did not negatively impact the community or public safety.
Justice Catherine Murray found part of Canada's Controlled Drugs and Substances Act unconstitutional and stayed the convictions against Jeremy Kalicum and Eris Nyx, who co-founded DULF.
In her decision, Murray said the founders' mission was to save lives by offering a safer supply of drugs. They bought drugs on the dark web, tested them to make sure they weren't contaminated, and sold them to members at cost.
In other words, because these drug providers test their narcotics, this somehow makes everyone safer. Can anyone make it make sense? Is the bar for safety solely based on whether or not something is laced with Fentanyl? Because that is an extremely low bar, if you ask me.
She said part of the CDSA "unjustifiably infringes" on two parts of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and deprives DULF members the "right to life and security of the person."
She gave Parliament six months to find a way to allow for a "pathway to non-medicalized safer supply."
This news comes after it was announced that inmates will be receiving paper straws for "safer" drug snorting.
Corrections Canada to distribute items for 'safe snorting' in federal prisons https://t.co/B5m7k2yp1W pic.twitter.com/OquWijg9ev
— National Post (@nationalpost) September 27, 2026
What is going on?
Here is a thought: How about the country focusing more efforts on getting all drugs out of its borders, rather than turning a blind eye and calling these so-called “compassion clubs” constitutional, when no one should ever have the right to destroy their lives with narcotics. That is just my two cents. You can draw your own conclusions, but this mentality that people should have the right to abuse drugs is deeply deranged and contradictory to the idea that all humans have intrinsic value. And the fact that the left pretends this makes everyone safer, while ignoring the fact that this will only create more addicts, tells you all you need to know.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Latest





